Roller rocker debate
#11
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
1.8's are a tool for me for the most part although have run them in the past. In some cases build depending they work well and worthy. Others not and gain not worthy. Never had valvetrain issues with them. It like 14 apache mentioned in your application gains would more than likely be minimal. I'd seriously consider 741 cam in your build.
#12
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 493
Likes: 17
From: San Tan Valley AZ
1.8's are a tool for me for the most part although have run them in the past. In some cases build depending they work well and worthy. Others not and gain not worthy. Never had valvetrain issues with them. It like 14 apache mentioned in your application gains would more than likely be minimal. I'd seriously consider 741 cam in your build.
#13
Registered

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
You have a 4.25 stroke engine. 8.6:1 is low, but pretty much same thing mercury used on the 525efi, 502 mags,, etc. Those were 4 inch stroke. A 4.25 stroke will require more camshaft.
I personally think that cam is going to be small in that build. Mercs 525efi, had a 236/244 cam with fairly low static. They run great. If you wanna make some power, youll need a cam that doesnt die at 5000-5200rpm.
I bought the comp ultra pro mag XD rockers last winter. So far so good. They look very beefy compared to the old cranes I had. I too ran cranes for years, had good luck, only 1 broke a trunnion. Then again, years back, we were running alot less spring psi, lot less rpm, milder cams, and so on.
I personally think that cam is going to be small in that build. Mercs 525efi, had a 236/244 cam with fairly low static. They run great. If you wanna make some power, youll need a cam that doesnt die at 5000-5200rpm.
I bought the comp ultra pro mag XD rockers last winter. So far so good. They look very beefy compared to the old cranes I had. I too ran cranes for years, had good luck, only 1 broke a trunnion. Then again, years back, we were running alot less spring psi, lot less rpm, milder cams, and so on.
#14
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 493
Likes: 17
From: San Tan Valley AZ
You have a 4.25 stroke engine. 8.6:1 is low, but pretty much same thing mercury used on the 525efi, 502 mags,, etc. Those were 4 inch stroke. A 4.25 stroke will require more camshaft.
I personally think that cam is going to be small in that build. Mercs 525efi, had a 236/244 cam with fairly low static. They run great. If you wanna make some power, youll need a cam that doesnt die at 5000-5200rpm.
I bought the comp ultra pro mag XD rockers last winter. So far so good. They look very beefy compared to the old cranes I had. I too ran cranes for years, had good luck, only 1 broke a trunnion. Then again, years back, we were running alot less spring psi, lot less rpm, milder cams, and so on.
I personally think that cam is going to be small in that build. Mercs 525efi, had a 236/244 cam with fairly low static. They run great. If you wanna make some power, youll need a cam that doesnt die at 5000-5200rpm.
I bought the comp ultra pro mag XD rockers last winter. So far so good. They look very beefy compared to the old cranes I had. I too ran cranes for years, had good luck, only 1 broke a trunnion. Then again, years back, we were running alot less spring psi, lot less rpm, milder cams, and so on.
#17
Registered

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
I too would stay with the 1.7 rockers. The 1820-16 have billet pushrod inserts, those are the ones i am running. The 1620-16, do not, and go for around 300-320 bucks if i recall , 100 bucks less than the 1820-16.
#18
Registered

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
#19
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 493
Likes: 17
From: San Tan Valley AZ
Flat tops. 020 in hole. 3cc reliefs 119 heads. Gonna run steel shim gasket to keep compression up and quench in check.
#20
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 493
Likes: 17
From: San Tan Valley AZ


