Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
502 engine build >

502 engine build

Notices

502 engine build

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-23-2017 | 08:39 PM
  #21  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: fox Lake IL
Default

Any brands to recommend on the rods? I have heard good things about Eagle products for the price.(from car guys)

When you say rebuild to stock specs, are you referring to my valve size question?
Heyglenn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-2017 | 09:01 PM
  #22  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Eagles are a good rod. More than likely that's what's in the other one now. Or scats. There all very similar just go with the arp 2000 rod bolts which many come with. Up many with the 8740 which would probably be fine also but I'd get the 2000 just for future get ants in your pants and want more power. I think joes post regarding stock specs meaning merc specs. Correct springs, bearing clearances, valve guides, just in general copy cat the original build. Specs are easy for any engine builder to get.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-2017 | 09:40 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

just curious why you would keep the comp. 9.0:1 or less I'm rebuilding a 468 and was thinking of going to 10.0:1
seaman is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-2017 | 09:42 PM
  #24  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by seaman
just curious why you would keep the comp. 9.0:1 or less I'm rebuilding a 468 and was thinking of going to 10.0:1
Alot of guys want to run 87 octane.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-2017 | 09:53 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

ok i run 93 octane would the higher comp cause water reversion
seaman is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-2017 | 10:40 PM
  #26  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by seaman
ok i run 93 octane would the higher comp cause water reversion
No. Like MT said also most out on the water and considering your boat I assumed you were limited to what the marinas had octane and also with a heavier boat like that under a constant load I'd tend to keep the comp 9:1 or what ever the engine come with originally. Tell us a little more about the boat. For an addditional half point of comp with near stock cam or even perf your looking at min hp gains and not worth it. Detonation causes many problems. You have twins or trips in the boat. I get the part you like to cruise. If you like to cruise keep it as close to stock as possible.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-23-2017 | 10:46 PM
  #27  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Never mind the twin or trip question. If you had trips you might have aluminum rods in the third. Just kidding but anyway good luck am keep us posted. Even is you added another 50 hp a side what would you really see in mph gain. 2-3 maybe. Not worth it with a top speed of ? Just trying to safe you frustration and down time.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-24-2017 | 12:50 PM
  #28  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: fox Lake IL
Default

I definatily want to keep the compression down to where I can use cheaper gas. My boats aren't harbor queens, usually only parked during normal working hours lol. I think I will go with the H-beam rods in the other one. Would give me a good lower end if (when)I get the itch for more power later. Good news is the machine shop just called and said the block that had water in the oil is all ok, had some worries. Will see if I can post some pics of the boat tonight.
Heyglenn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-24-2017 | 01:45 PM
  #29  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,428
Likes: 3,955
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

Originally Posted by Heyglenn
Any brands to recommend on the rods? I have heard good things about Eagle products for the price.(from car guys)

When you say rebuild to stock specs, are you referring to my valve size question?
I would choose SCAT over eagle, I ran some scat H-beams in a 540
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Reply
Old 01-25-2017 | 08:31 PM
  #30  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

Originally Posted by 33outlawsst
I would choose SCAT over eagle, I ran some scat H-beams in a 540
i have used both,imo they are equil,both use arp bolts and the big end size is spot on all the ones i have used.the pricing is also about the same.when it comes to crankshaft,s i would go with the scat,for some reason the eagle cranks i have used had journal dias all over the place.the scats were right on size.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.