Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
565s short on Rpms >

565s short on Rpms

Notices

565s short on Rpms

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-30-2017 | 05:12 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 10
From: LOTO 36.5 mm
Default

Trimmed properly, the 92 was at sea level. The max RPM is 5400. That would hopefully be around 90 at the correct Rpm.
Lake Bound is offline  
Reply
Old 03-30-2017 | 08:37 PM
  #12  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,037
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

32 maximus 5 blade is one hell of alot of prop to turn with 565 hp, i think everything would have to be perfect, as air, low fuel, loose water etc, just my opinion
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 03-30-2017 | 10:05 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 10
From: LOTO 36.5 mm
Default

Thanks, Arctic friends. That's 565s are we times two. We're coming from a 2005 30 Outlaw with 496 HOs spinning 30 Labbed four blades. I know Maximus are much harder to pull.
Lake Bound is offline  
Reply
Old 03-30-2017 | 10:34 PM
  #14  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

Originally Posted by Lake Bound
Have seen a GPS reading of 92.
was everything the same as it is now,espically asking if it had the same props.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2017 | 12:40 AM
  #15  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,241
Likes: 2,490
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

I'd call Pat at AT and ask him about trim settings.
I just don't see why both engines would go into any guardian mode at the same time.
With 565's and all available power, you should easily hit 90. The 525EFI 33 AT was over 90mph.
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2017 | 12:52 AM
  #16  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,613
Likes: 375
From: Traverse City MI
Default

What's saltwater good for.....2-3mph.......Still wierd.

Drives toed in correctly still?
offshorexcursion is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2017 | 07:37 AM
  #17  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 82
From: Henderson, KY
Default

Sorry, had to put this here.... Some labbed 32's would make it fly!

Other than running it out, at least you're boating this week!
ALL_IN! is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2017 | 09:21 AM
  #18  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 3
From: Fredericksburg, Va
Default

I'm with smitty on this...don't see those engine's having enough a$$ to turn those props...
ezstriper is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2017 | 05:03 PM
  #19  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 1,168
From: taxachusetts
Default

time for him to lose the fat girls and pick up some fountain skanks,,
sutphen 30 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2017 | 08:52 AM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 10
From: LOTO 36.5 mm
Default

Looks like no engine issues. We saw 86 mph yesterday. I dint catch the Rpms, with a little more playing with triming angle. I could have ran it out longer but a few stray cruiser wakes around. Will try to get to 5400 Rpm today before going on trailer to back home. The short sport drives don't like to be trimmed much. Thanks, for the replys.
Lake Bound is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.