Excessive blowby and oil leaks
#32
Registered

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,031
Likes: 10
From: westville, NJ
How wide was the end gap? Cuz you would need 50 thou or more to get any great amount t of blowby. Remember, there is another comp ring in there too... I think those rings and those pistons don't like each other.
#33
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 312
Likes: 22
From: Reno, NV
I can't tell you as it is so embarrassing LOL. I have no idea what I was thinking or doing but I really screwed this up bad. Lets just say the gap was in tenths not thousands. It is why I had so much blow by. The leakdown test was obvious something was wrong. I am just going to use the total seals the pistons came with and put it back together.
#34
Registered
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
I can't tell you as it is so embarrassing LOL. I have no idea what I was thinking or doing but I really screwed this up bad. Lets just say the gap was in tenths not thousands. It is why I had so much blow by. The leakdown test was obvious something was wrong. I am just going to use the total seals the pistons came with and put it back together.
I would be surprised if it is the ring gap that caused this. I have been forced to run ring sets for a 5.250" cylinder in a 5.280 cylinder because rings were not available and custom rings were of poor quality at the time. Surprisingly there was no noticeable compression loss or oil control problems.
I would be looking at your cam and if reversion is an issue in your application. The larger the C.I. the more prone you are to reversion.
P.S. that's a great Sun leak-down tester!
#36
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 312
Likes: 22
From: Reno, NV
I would be surprised if it is the ring gap that caused this. I have been forced to run ring sets for a 5.250" cylinder in a 5.280 cylinder because rings were not available and custom rings were of poor quality at the time. Surprisingly there was no noticeable compression loss or oil control problems.
I would be looking at your cam and if reversion is an issue in your application. The larger the C.I. the more prone you are to reversion.
P.S. that's a great Sun leak-down tester!
I would be looking at your cam and if reversion is an issue in your application. The larger the C.I. the more prone you are to reversion.
P.S. that's a great Sun leak-down tester!
#37
Registered
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Your exhaust valve closes pretty late for what I have been told is except-able. This can also depend on the drop in your exhaust, where the water is mixed, etc.
But for example, I had some reversion and mine closed 9.2 degrees atdc at .050, its all a game of what you can get away with. My new exhaust isn't going to mix the water in until the tip of the tail, but then again I don't have much drop.
What rpm do you idle at?
But for example, I had some reversion and mine closed 9.2 degrees atdc at .050, its all a game of what you can get away with. My new exhaust isn't going to mix the water in until the tip of the tail, but then again I don't have much drop.
What rpm do you idle at?
#38
Registered

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
I can't tell you as it is so embarrassing LOL. I have no idea what I was thinking or doing but I really screwed this up bad. Lets just say the gap was in tenths not thousands. It is why I had so much blow by. The leakdown test was obvious something was wrong. I am just going to use the total seals the pistons came with and put it back together.


