Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Gimble ring replacement access panel >

Gimble ring replacement access panel


Gimble ring replacement access panel

Old 12-12-2021, 10:06 PM
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 872
Received 121 Likes on 76 Posts
Default Gimble ring replacement access panel

Has anyone seen or heard of any strength issues with the bravo outer transom plates when the access panel is cut out of the back instead of using the mercury holes drilled through the sides?

I havenít heard of any myself but only personally know them on boats under 70mph. Just something Iíve been curious about for a few years.
tmmii is offline  
Old 12-12-2021, 11:54 PM
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: LI,NY
Posts: 41
Received 33 Likes on 12 Posts

If you're referring to the JR marine kit. I did that on the Outlaw I had, though it was a sub 70 mph boat I never had any issues while it was on the boat. When I pulled the motor I replaced the whole transom assembly since I had access to it
anger mgmt is offline  
Old 12-13-2021, 08:04 AM
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA, PA
Posts: 588
Received 203 Likes on 119 Posts

I have those on both my drives, no issues so far after 3 years. My boat tops at 67, so sorry it's also under 70.
SabrToothSqrl is offline  
Old 12-13-2021, 11:45 AM
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,785
Received 243 Likes on 141 Posts

Had the jr mod on my 70mph boat for 7-8 years-250hrs. No issues at all. I wouldn't hesitate on installing it.
underpsi68 is offline  
Old 12-15-2021, 10:40 AM
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 292
Received 163 Likes on 83 Posts

I'm running one on an 80mph single Bravo.
87MirageIntruder is offline  
Old 12-15-2021, 10:31 PM
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,358
Received 520 Likes on 239 Posts

Not sure I would translate load on bravo vs. top speed.

faster boats have less drag, lighter weight, and sometimes more power.

i.e. a top gun with twin steps that runs 85 is likely putting less load on drive of a old flat bottom that is only running 70mph.

the are that is modified to do the kit is not a high stress area. I say go for it.
1MOSES1 is online now  
Old 12-16-2021, 11:23 AM
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 248
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

I ran it on a 27 big block Crownline for 9yrs and no issues and rebuilt them using the same kit on my current PowerQuest 380 back in 2013. Only issue I had with the Powerquest was CP Performance drive shower hits bottom cap screws if drives are turned all the way and trimmed up all the way. It damaged cap screws and threads, so i put in heli-coils and went with button head socket screws and did some grinding on drive showers where they touched for additional clearance.
Cory H is offline  
Old 12-21-2021, 11:40 AM
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Further South East of Dome Island
Posts: 1,991
Received 26 Likes on 15 Posts

Change the entire TA instead.
Pismo10 is offline  
Old 12-21-2021, 12:23 PM
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA, PA
Posts: 588
Received 203 Likes on 119 Posts

Originally Posted by Pismo10 View Post
Change the entire TA instead.
I think that's yes the best option, but not having to pull the engines is a plus I did mine and am happy w/the results.
SabrToothSqrl is offline  
Old 12-21-2021, 02:13 PM
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Naples , Fl
Posts: 190
Received 30 Likes on 20 Posts

Hydraulic steering ….
smokediver is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.