Notices

Blowers

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-23-2002, 12:39 PM
  #1  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
Quiet Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Blowers

Why does it take two carbs to make the same amount of hp on roots type blowers than Whipples. In the 700hp range on a hp500. Do the roots type use more fuel?
Quiet Storm is offline  
Old 12-23-2002, 01:02 PM
  #2  
blown1500
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hello Quiet Storm,
It takes a certain amount of air flow to make any given hp. For 700 hp, one carb on a roots blower is enough air, but most roots blowers big enough to make that much power need two carbs to give better fuel distribution. One carb on a proper blower top will work. Roots blowers are not as efficient as Whipples or Prochargers, therefore they use more fuel and make less power at the same boost.
 
Old 12-23-2002, 02:24 PM
  #3  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
Quiet Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

blown1500
The reason for my question is I spoke to an engine builder about what I want from a pair of hp500's. I was thinking Whipples all the way. From the charts it looks fairly easy for them to produce that hp. He suggested the roots because if you use a big enough one, they can turn slower and make less heat. That’s better for the engine. Okay, but the boat that I'm looking at only holds 110 gallons of fuel. With twin 750 or larger Holleys on each motor, I think I would spend as much time refueling as boating. Is there a significant difference in fuel consumption?
Quiet Storm is offline  
Old 12-23-2002, 02:57 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

quietstorm,

No question, the more efficient blower will consume less fuel. But roots usually need two carbs for equal distribution and usually need more fuel to cool the intake air charge. On a 500hp carb with our sc, the stock 800 works just fine, the air volume is not perfect, but it certainly flows enough fuel to make 700hp. A 1050 dominator will make 20+hp more at the same air fuel with the larger CFM flow.

Some engine builders will recommend roots because thats what they know, they've done them time and time again and have good faith in them, there also typically much cheaper, but there is very little question that they are not as efficient as the later generation superchargers such as the screw and centrifugal.

It's not as simple as bigger is better, a 1471 turning so slow to make 700hp would be very inefficient so thats not quite true, every supercharger has an efficiency range. And either way, the roots is still going to create more heat at those boost ranges (4+lbs.).

Thanks,
Dustin
Whipple Charged is offline  
Old 12-23-2002, 05:50 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lake Lanier, GA
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Quiet Storm:

HP is HP The Whipple systems are more efficient than a roots blower, but the B.S.F.C. (Brake Specific Fuel Conusmption) or the amount of fuel used to make that HP will be very comparable. You'll see alot more difference at the gas pump based on how you prop, & drive rather than which style of blower you use. There are pros & cons to each system, and you can very easily make the type of power you want with either system. I've got a 468" BBC with a 250 Blower Shop Blower and a single 1095 King Demon that makes well over 700HP on pump gas.

Doug
RumRunner is offline  
Old 12-26-2002, 09:35 PM
  #6  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
Quiet Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The engine builder suggested BDS 871's for my application. We didn't get int the size of carbs? I want to upgrade the Bravo 1 drives with the Teague Platinum Series upgrade and change the ratio from 1.50 to 1.36. Maybe the will last awhile at 700HP.

Doug
So far all I see more pros for the Whipples. I have them on my 454's now and after they were dialed in have been fine. What are the pros for the roots type other than they look fantastic.

Dustin
How much height would the 3.3's with intercoolers add to the height of the HP 500's? And are you suggesting the 1050 dominators for this setup?

Thanks
Roger
Quiet Storm is offline  
Old 12-27-2002, 12:44 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Quietstorm, the 3.3L with intercoolers or without would be approx. 3" taller and I gain that back by running a 10 x 2" stainless flame arrestor from Eddie Marine. If you want to take some measurments, from the valley of the block to the carb mounting flange is approx. 12" SC has a 4500 bolt pattern. If you want the best carb, I would run a King Demon 1095 or 1195. I don't think you'll need the replaceable sleeves. The one thing the compressor loves is air flow, and the BG's flow a lot of air, I mean a bunch! And you know, looks are worth at least 200 horsepower!

Thanks,
Dustin
Whipple Charged is offline  
Old 12-27-2002, 06:41 PM
  #8  
blown1500
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Quiet Storm,
Rum Runner is right. HP is HP and the brake specific fuel is about the same, but-it takes more HP to pull a roots type blower than the much more efficient Whipple. I have seen engines with the same prop shaft power get noticably better fuel ecenomy with Whipples. Why do you think you need a cogged belt system to run almost any boost with roots type blowers? We install roots type blowers all the time but we recommend Whipples. Usually, the choice is made for appearance or because the customer believes what someone else has said about how much power the roots type make. Littlefield and many others make good quality parts and their systems are reliable and beautiful-but, put in a pinch, they usually admit they cannot compete with Whipples or centrifugal hp in a properly matched set up. The ultimate, though the most expensive is TURBOCHARGERS
 
Old 12-27-2002, 10:04 PM
  #9  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
Quiet Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you guys for all the information. I’ve learned a lot from this. I am looking at a specific hull type but the boats I have found have different motor arrangements. Some have blowers (roots type) and others that are good candidates for blowers. The boat that I like the most has HP 500’s. After talking to the engine builder I wasn’t sure what type of blower to go with.

I’ll go with the Whipples with the King Demon carbs., bonus info from Dustin. I’m not up to turbochargers yet.

Thanks
Roger
Quiet Storm is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 06:47 AM
  #10  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lake Lanier, GA
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Roger:

I went with the roots blower for the look, and the price (I couldn't beat the deal) We do alot of work with Whipple stuff, they are great !!! They build tremendous power, and a ton of torque very quickly. If you need a hand getting the carburetors dialed in once you get everything together let me know.

Doug
RumRunner is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
merlin
Wanted
9
02-03-2008 10:30 AM
JJONES
General Q & A
6
09-12-2005 05:25 PM
CIG3
General Q & A
14
10-16-2004 11:31 PM
fountain525sc
General Boating Discussion
28
02-03-2003 09:20 PM
tomjarrell
General Boating Discussion
0
02-03-2003 09:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: Blowers


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.