Notices

400 Sbc

Old 09-11-2003 | 01:15 PM
  #11  
robyw1's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,759
Likes: 1
From: Cypress, TX
Default

Originally posted by Iggy
Couldn't the steam holes be opend up to a larger size?
No way look below at how close they are to the cylinders and headbolt holes. You would be asking for a crack to develop.

Roby
Attached Thumbnails 400 Sbc-400sbc.jpg  

Last edited by robyw1; 09-11-2003 at 01:18 PM.
robyw1 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2003 | 01:27 PM
  #12  
robyw1's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,759
Likes: 1
From: Cypress, TX
Default

Offshore addiction really hit on a big problem. Now that I think about it, If I had 400SBC on a boat I would definitely use a closed cooling system

Roby
robyw1 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2003 | 02:51 PM
  #13  
Whitey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Eaton Rapids, Mi , USA
Default

Thanks guys, Would it be better to build a pair of 383 than to go with the 400s? I would do a pir of big blocks but, my boat is already set up for the small blocks. I am hoping to be around 400-425 hp once done, and still be reliable. Thanks again and appreciate all the in put.

Last edited by Whitey; 09-11-2003 at 04:26 PM.
Whitey is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-2003 | 06:42 AM
  #14  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 163
From: King george, Virginia/Potomac River
Default One more thing

Don't use head studs on a 400. The bolt hole is so close to the cylinder wall that the shoulder of the stud against the deck will create fatigue over a long period of time and end up with a crack. Saw 2 blocks that this happened to.
Shah Mat is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-2003 | 08:45 AM
  #15  
robyw1's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,759
Likes: 1
From: Cypress, TX
Default

One other small issue even if you build a 383 is that you are somewhat limited on your cam size. This is do to interference between the rod bolts and the cam lobe. This problem will be even more pronounced if the mains have been align-bored

Roby

WOW all this block talk has gotten me wanting to build another super mouse motor

Last edited by robyw1; 09-12-2003 at 08:48 AM.
robyw1 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-2003 | 09:22 AM
  #16  
Whitey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Eaton Rapids, Mi , USA
Default

I have read that you can now get small diameter cams so you will not have the interferance problem. I am interested in this because I currently have 6.2s and I could either build on what I have or use the 400s that I have readily available. I think I could use some of the 6.2 parts on the 400s.
Whitey is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-2003 | 09:25 AM
  #17  
robyw1's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,759
Likes: 1
From: Cypress, TX
Default

I think you need to use the 1.6 or longer rockers with them though. Then again you are probably talking about somehting different.

Roby
robyw1 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-2003 | 11:20 AM
  #18  
rmbuilder's Avatar
MarineKinetics
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
Default

A small base circle cam and/or H-beam rods will eliminate your cam clearance problems. You can buy rotating assemblies (internal balance) now with a cast crank, 6 inch H-beam rods and SRP dished pistons (great for quench) for about $1000. The only possible grinding you will have to do then may be for the rod bolt clearance around the oil pan rails.
Hope this helps,
Bob
rmbuilder is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-2003 | 11:33 AM
  #19  
robyw1's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,759
Likes: 1
From: Cypress, TX
Default

I had to grint the stinking (you know what) out of my rod bolts to clear cam lobe and pan rails. Keep in mind that this will weaken the rod bolts and do wonders for the balanced assembly. Really no getting around it.

Roby
robyw1 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-2003 | 12:20 PM
  #20  
rmbuilder's Avatar
MarineKinetics
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
Default

The H-beam rods use cap screws instead of rod bolts and nuts eliminating the need to grind any of the rotating assembly. Just the oil pan rails, and very little there.
Hope this helps,
bob
rmbuilder is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thedonz
General Q & A
14
12-08-2006 12:04 PM
imq707s
General Q & A
10
08-27-2004 07:34 PM
Shah Mat
General Q & A
15
06-26-2004 12:22 AM
scarabrick
General Q & A
3
07-31-2002 09:25 AM
scarabrick
General Q & A
4
07-10-2002 10:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.