Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Rocker Ratio 1.7 vs. 1.8 >

Rocker Ratio 1.7 vs. 1.8

Notices

Rocker Ratio 1.7 vs. 1.8

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-18-2005 | 11:47 AM
  #11  
Pat McPherson's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 3
From: Ivoryton, CT
Default Re: Rocker Ratio 1.7 vs. 1.8

Hi Guys,
I ran the add 0.028" of lift through desk-top-dyno and it would seem like the +8 horsepower is not worth the switch.
How much of a gain is there from going for stamped to roller? 5-10HP?

Yes, I have thought of the ZZ502 cam. But Mark at Precision told me that cam is not a vary good cam for an MPI engines with only 8.7:1 compression...
Also, I have the short captain call risers.
__________________
Patrick
Pat McPherson is offline  
Reply
Old 02-19-2005 | 11:52 AM
  #12  
rush's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Reedville, va. Chesapeake Bay
Default Re: Rocker Ratio 1.7 vs. 1.8

I would go with rollers either way, there stronger an much more precise
rush is offline  
Reply
Old 02-20-2005 | 07:08 AM
  #13  
martiniboat's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: Brussels, Ont. CAN. Landlocked between Lake Huron, Ontario and Erie
Default Re: Rocker Ratio 1.7 vs. 1.8

You'll never regret buying a good set of roller rockers (ie. Comp Cams stainless magnum version) if only for the piece of mind. I've broken/cracked most other aluminum body roller or stamped steel versions.

I now rev freely with no worries
martiniboat is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2005 | 01:43 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: MO
Default Re: Rocker Ratio 1.7 vs. 1.8

The correct way to figure is take lobe lift times rocker ratio.

Example:
DUR:
248 IN----254 EX @ .050

287 IN----292 EX Ad.

Lift:
.663 IN---.680 EX

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lobe lift :
.390 IN---.400 EX

1.7 ratio .663 IN---.680 EX
1.8 ratio .702 IN---.720 EX
1.9 ratio .741 IN---.760 EX
2.0 ratio .780 IN---.800 EX
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
All cams are advertised with the lift amount for the rocker ratio the motor had stock. A small block chevy will sometimes have a cam with more lobe lift than a big block cam, but be advertised with less lift because of the factory ratio of 1.5.

Advantages to more rocker ratio is quicker valve movements in the same time frame so valve velocity is increased. The motor thinks it has a more agg. camshaft. The obvious reason is more total valve lift.

If you ever change anything in the valve-train you must figure valve geom. (pushrod length) at the very last. Nothing wrong with running more rocker ratio, but must check V to P clearance and pushrod length.

All cams are figured this way, it's just easier for them to give you the total valve lift for the stock rocker ratio when advertising.
NOBODY is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2005 | 06:58 AM
  #15  
Pat McPherson's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 3
From: Ivoryton, CT
Default Re: Rocker Ratio 1.7 vs. 1.8

Originally Posted by NOBODY
Advantages to more rocker ratio is quicker valve movements in the same time frame so valve velocity is increased. The motor thinks it has a more agg. camshaft.
Good Point!
I had not thought about that one...
__________________
Patrick
Pat McPherson is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2005 | 10:39 AM
  #16  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 39
From: Further South East of Dome Island
Default Re: Rocker Ratio 1.7 vs. 1.8

Make sure you have enough clearance between the valve and the piston still.........
Pismo10 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
imq707s
General Q & A
9
08-11-2013 06:40 PM
rhsj2006
General Q & A
15
08-27-2008 12:02 AM
26scarab
General Q & A
3
06-14-2006 10:45 AM
ratman
General Q & A
12
03-27-2005 10:30 PM
ratman
General Boating Discussion
0
03-26-2005 10:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.