Volvo vs. Merc.
02-28-2005 | 01:54 PM
#11
*
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 138
From: PortRoyal Bermuda
Re: Volvo vs. Merc.
Originally Posted by hillbilly24
mercruiser dominates the market mostly becuase of problames in Volvo Pentas past. they have made alot of poor product, Merc has had thier share too though. Currently as far a stock family boat that you dont want to do more then 60 in Volvo does build a superior product. However, I used to work at a shop that was a dealer for both and Mercruiser is a dream to deal with on warranty and when a dealer goes to bat for a customer they will ussually bend over backwards and cover things under what they call "customer relations" even when it is clearly not a warranty issue. They once payed for an engine that had a cracked head to a burned impeller that hadn't been changed for 230 hours but the guy had an extended warranty and he put a stink and they took care of it. Perhaps this is why thier engines cost so damded much though. Volvo is a pain in the ass to deal with on warranty issues, once you have bought thier product, you are on your own and becusae of this they don't get much repeat buissnes
Strange ... in 35 years my experiences are point for point the exact opposite of those above .... except for .*merc has had their share too*
For me if it's between 0 and 425 hp its red .. after that you can have whatever you want !..
02-28-2005 | 03:30 PM
#12
Registered
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 39
From: Further South East of Dome Island
Re: Volvo vs. Merc.
The Volvo duoprop seems to be stronger than Bravo III especially in heavier boats. A builder of fishing boats in the south told me he was experiencing 80% failure rate of the Bravo III in boats over 8500lbs. He had no such problems with the Volvo duoprop.
02-28-2005 | 03:56 PM
#13
Registered
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 2
Re: Volvo vs. Merc.
Originally Posted by madbouyz
Strange ... in 35 years my experiences are point for point the exact opposite of those above .... except for .*merc has had their share too*
02-28-2005 | 06:35 PM
#14
VIP Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 333
From: ankeny,ia.
Re: Volvo vs. Merc.
Originally Posted by Pat McPherson
Why does Mercruiser have so much more of the market share?
Is Mercruiser's product that much better than Volvo Penta's?
Aren't the engines basically the same?
Is Mercruiser's product that much better than Volvo Penta's?
Aren't the engines basically the same?
It probably helps that Brunswick ( merc's parent
company) owns some of the largest boat
manufacturers out there.
And some of the one's they don't own,
they have been know to loan money to,
or own stock in.
......kind of guarantees you market share
Last edited by jt29olhp500s; 03-01-2005 at 11:29 AM.
02-28-2005 | 07:43 PM
#15
Platinum Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 16,435
Likes: 2
From: USA
Re: Volvo vs. Merc.
Originally Posted by Pismo10
The Volvo duoprop seems to be stronger than Bravo III especially in heavier boats. A builder of fishing boats in the south told me he was experiencing 80% failure rate of the Bravo III in boats over 8500lbs. He had no such problems with the Volvo duoprop.
Hands Down I'll take a Volvo over a Merc anyday. I walk through my Marina and all I see are Bravo 3's with rot all over them. Yet all the boats with Volvo Duo Props are rot free. Hmmmm strange but these people will replace their Bravo 3's with a new Bravo 3. Yet the people with Volvo don't have to replace their drives due to corrosion every other year or 3 .
03-01-2005 | 05:44 AM
#16
Registered
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
From: Manhasset, NY
Re: Volvo vs. Merc.
I am in the process of re-powering my boat right now...my boat came with a volvo 330hp duo-prop and ran trouble free for the first owner and now myself for 4 years. Although it is against the grain here on OSO I have decided to stick with the Volvo. I am repowering for reason of more reliable HP... not for problems with the old motor. Yes it is true that Merc is superior for adding HP after the warrenty is up but I feel 420+HP is plenty for my 25' boat.....and turnkey reliable too....besides if I do get the bug for more speed I have heard Raylar makes a bolt on kit for any 496 motor including Volvo .
.
03-01-2005 | 07:46 AM
#18
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 4
From: Boca Raton, FL
Re: Volvo vs. Merc.
No one has mentioned that for every Volvo authorized service center there are 20 Mercruiser.
Mercruiser replacement parts are less expensive partly because they are mass-produced compared to Volvo.
Price a Y-pipe for a Volvo 280 or 290 and you'll see what I mean. Most Volvo places won't stock them, so you wait for a special order and you pay the shipping.
Sold used high performance boats for many years...buyers want the black thing hanging off the transom.
Mercruiser replacement parts are less expensive partly because they are mass-produced compared to Volvo.
Price a Y-pipe for a Volvo 280 or 290 and you'll see what I mean. Most Volvo places won't stock them, so you wait for a special order and you pay the shipping.
Sold used high performance boats for many years...buyers want the black thing hanging off the transom.
03-01-2005 | 08:55 AM
#19
Thread Starter
VIP Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 3
From: Ivoryton, CT
Re: Volvo vs. Merc.
From my personal experience with Volvo Penta, I have not had any problems getting parts from my local dealer. The prices have been vary comparable to Merc; maybe less $$.
Has anyone ever bought an oil pump from Merc.? A friend of mine just ordered one for his 525SC and it was $500. I bet him a 30 pack that it was the same as a $100 one from GM. Guess who won the bet? One vary expensive sticker they put on the box...
I had a 1975 Donzi with a Volvo 280 and the only thing I ever had to buy were zincs.
I now have kind of a mix with my Volvo engine and Merc drive and it works well for me. There are lots of prop choises for my Bravo drive along with after market stuff like external steering and drive showers.
As for the engine I will say that I like the the serpentine set up, the crank driven sea pump, and fuel pump placement far better than the way Merc has there stuff bolted on...
I'm rebuilding a Merc. 502 this winter and I will be using all of the accessories off my Volvo Penta 7.4, not the Merc stuff. I may even buy an AZ Speed Intake off of a Volvo 8.2...
Has anyone ever bought an oil pump from Merc.? A friend of mine just ordered one for his 525SC and it was $500. I bet him a 30 pack that it was the same as a $100 one from GM. Guess who won the bet? One vary expensive sticker they put on the box...
I had a 1975 Donzi with a Volvo 280 and the only thing I ever had to buy were zincs.
I now have kind of a mix with my Volvo engine and Merc drive and it works well for me. There are lots of prop choises for my Bravo drive along with after market stuff like external steering and drive showers.
As for the engine I will say that I like the the serpentine set up, the crank driven sea pump, and fuel pump placement far better than the way Merc has there stuff bolted on...
I'm rebuilding a Merc. 502 this winter and I will be using all of the accessories off my Volvo Penta 7.4, not the Merc stuff. I may even buy an AZ Speed Intake off of a Volvo 8.2...
__________________
Patrick
Patrick
Last edited by Pat McPherson; 03-01-2005 at 08:59 AM.
03-01-2005 | 10:17 AM
#20
Registered
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 39
From: Further South East of Dome Island
Re: Volvo vs. Merc.
I believe in Volvos especially on dual prop heavier boats but I do love the Mercs. My 1979 305 V8 Mercruiser pre-alpha sterndrive went over 3000hrs with no problems. Original valve train, all original manifolds, engine never opened up. I even used the original water pump impeller until 2003, thats 24 years and 2800+hrs on the original impeller without a propblem. Drive never blew up, replaced transom bearing a couple times and one u-joint once. Some new accessories but no major problems in over 3000hrs. Hope to get that kind of life out of my 1996 502 Mag bravo I.
