Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
90 7.4L upgrade? >

90 7.4L upgrade?

Notices

90 7.4L upgrade?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-04-2005 | 01:14 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 15
From: Sun Prairie, WI
Default Re: 90 7.4L upgrade?

what about the higher idle rpm and beating on the drive issue?
cloudmaster_321 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-2005 | 01:20 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: ST. Louis, MO, USA
Default Re: 90 7.4L upgrade?

Not true unless you go really big on the cam. Merc made the 454 in 330 (yours), 365, 400, and 420hp versions. None have high idle.

Originally Posted by cloudmaster_321
what about the higher idle rpm and beating on the drive issue?
Gary Anderson is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-2005 | 01:25 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: ST. Louis, MO, USA
Default Re: 90 7.4L upgrade?

BTW, a big part of those other motors making more power, in addition to bigger ports and cams, is that they can spin to 5000-5200. Your cast crank will survive to 5000rpm if you dont abuse it. The valve springs wont like those rpm, so add that to your cam, lifter, springs, headwork upgrade too.
Gary
Gary Anderson is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-2005 | 02:22 PM
  #14  
Rookie's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,020
Likes: 1,522
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default Re: 90 7.4L upgrade?

Not to jump off topic, but it somewhat pertains to this thread. It was mentioned earlier that he could go with 1.8 rockers. I have 420's or 425's with the lager rectangle I think 049 heads, or the HI Performnce chevy head. They have been pocket ported, and I was thinking of replacing the roller rockers, 1.7 Scorpions, to 1.8's. would I have to do much to use 1.8's and would it be beneficial. Or would it be pushing the HP up in the 55-5800 range where I wouldn't want to spin the engine at. By the way where is the peak power made in the 420's or 425's.
Rookie is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-2005 | 03:24 PM
  #15  
SeaRay Jim's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
From: DFW, Texas
Default Re: 90 7.4L upgrade?

Originally Posted by cloudmaster_321
....He also said i would prolly not be able to get a skier out of the hole either with a cam mod. Any other opinions??
From that, I think if you share what your goals are that might help. If you end up making changes that add power, you could easily end up sacrificing low end torque for higher RPM and power and defeat the purpose you have your boat for. I'm going my the skier comment and making assumptions but knowing exaclty what you want to accomplish is the first step in making any modifications.

At least that's my opinion.
SeaRay Jim is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-2005 | 04:03 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville,TN, USA
Default Re: 90 7.4L upgrade?

If you do much of a cam upgrade at all, the rocker arms may be suspect. Depending on your particular parts, you may have the lower grade rockers. They are prone to excessive wear at the pushrod with higher spring tension and extended lift.

The gains you will get from what you describe here will be minimal in my opinion. You will change the sound a little and make the ultimately reliable 454/330 less reliable. Maybe gain a couple of mph if you are very lucky. Maybe ! Cam changes for this motor make more power at higher RPM.

Personally, I would add a safer for the engine, better and lighter exhaust system, maybe a better flowing flame arrestor, upgrade the oil in the motor and drive and call it a day. You'll get similar performance results but INCREASE your overall reliability instead of decreasing it.

Just a thought.
deboatmon is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-2005 | 04:59 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 32
Default Re: 90 7.4L upgrade?

WARNING: You are about to take the first step onto a slippery slope; the need for speed is a disease! I had a 1990 boat with a 7.4L so I can tell you exactly what I did and how it performed. It's also how I got hooked.

It's no use changing just the cam. You need a better intake, at least port your heads and change the cam and lifters. I basically copied the 454 Magnum. I used the stock Qjet with richer secondary rods, and Edelbrock Performer - O intake and a Speed Pro cam that had the same specs as the 454 Magnum cam (224 @ 0.050", 0.510 lift with stock rockers). Staying with this lift meant I didn't have to change the springs, but I checked them for tension and coil bind first. I don't know if 1.8 rockers would help. If I was going to use them anywhere on the engine it would be the exhaust side due to the single pattern cam and stock exhaust manifolds. But now exhaust lift is 0.540" so check the springs again.

I had the heads pocket ported and valve job done by a professional and matched the intake ports to the intake manifold myself. (That's a lot of cast iron to remove and you will only do it once!)

In stock form the boat went 60 mph spinning a 21 Mirage prop at 5000 RPM. Modified I could spin a 23 Mirage at 5000 RPM for a 5 mph gain. This confirms that the changes turned the 300 HP 7.4L into a 365. This is the easiest HP you will ever get in a boat, after that you really need to start thinking about better parts.

Do a search on "330 on steriods" and you will find a bunch of stuff about turning your engine into 400 HP. Better heads are the key to that.

P.S. There was no discernible effect on idle quality or speed or bottom end power. Your mechanic is thinking about the effect of much bigger cams.

Tom

Last edited by tomcat; 04-04-2005 at 05:05 PM.
tomcat is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-2005 | 11:32 PM
  #18  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 15
From: Sun Prairie, WI
Default Re: 90 7.4L upgrade?

i didn't know my boat was 330hp, thought the pshp was only 300, mine is on a baja 210 ess btw
cloudmaster_321 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-2005 | 07:44 AM
  #19  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 32
Default Re: 90 7.4L upgrade?

Your engine is only 300 HP. But the previous model had better heads and was called 330. That thread has good info if you switch to regular oval port heads instead of the panut port heads that you have now.
tomcat is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-2005 | 09:07 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: ST. Louis, MO, USA
Default Re: 90 7.4L upgrade?

Hmmm, I thought they just rebadged the peanut port engines from 330 flywheel hp (330 TRS) to 300 shaft hp (7.4L) in the mid/late 80s.
Gary

Originally Posted by tomcat
Your engine is only 300 HP. But the previous model had better heads and was called 330. That thread has good info if you switch to regular oval port heads instead of the panut port heads that you have now.
Gary Anderson is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.