CT B.S. Thread
#2021
Recreational boats just out for a day on the water or are you talking race boats actually competing in races? The two 37 AT's weren't racing when they went put on an acrobatics show... Big difference if so!
#2023
Probably safe to say all of these spins/rolls had some driver error related to them...
#2025
Registered

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,757
Likes: 153
From: Connecticut
Good info Dan. Would you say that boat is comparable to Adams? There is a staggered 37 AT that ran 95 with 600's.
#2026
Don't believe that boat had full cockpit and cabin like the newer ones. Should be comparable speed wise. Amazing a 1993 hull design is still fairly fast. Won't have any time in an AT till Adam gets his together.
#2028
Massey had those engines warmed up and also put some decent parts in them when he was forced to have them rebuilt (after rolling the boat). He said the boat ran around 91-92 when he got it and 94-95 after bumping up the engines a bit. Even so, I don't think you can compare even stock 600 numbers with those of a 525, those SC engines make a lot more torque. Pat at AT claims there was no speed advantage with the staggard setup. I still find this strange and wonder if it had more to do with that boat having a very heavy layup (which he admitted), even though it only had a partial cockpit. Regardless, I think it's safe to say mid 80's is pretty much the norm for stock 37 AT's with 525's, very reasonable IMO given the full cabin and typical well appointed features.
With that being said, you know as well as I do Adam's wont have 'stock' power either, if he ever gets this one put back together!
With that being said, you know as well as I do Adam's wont have 'stock' power either, if he ever gets this one put back together!
#2029



