Here We Go Again III
06-20-2012 | 01:52 PM
#73
Registered
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 3
From: Fairfield, CT
06-20-2012 | 06:17 PM
#75
Registered
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 706
From: Taunton Ma
Not sure it's a completely false number scot, the port engine was misfiring and required that throttle to be at least an inch forward more to maintain the same rpm as the starboard. With the port at full throttle and starboard at 3/4 it was pulling 4500, only buried both for a couple seconds. Also the boat was loaded pretty heavy. Max rpm on my motors is 5000-5200, so if it does that light and 4600-4700 loaded id say it's about right
06-21-2012 | 10:15 AM
#78
VIP Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 1
From: CT, FL
Ive seen 105 with full fuel and 6 people, but my cousin has a GPS pic at 103, I have no idea how to get it from his phone to here. Going to put some 17x33 5 blades on soon and maybe ill see 110. Flip the pulleys back and itll run 120. Hopefully that will be enough to take out the flamer.
Take out from what, I'm 5ft longer, wider, lighter, with stock power....this bench racing **** is crap...oh and a more efficient hull that doesn't do funky **** over 100...yea...
I'm happy the boat is running well, looked good when I saw it last weekend Adam....
There's always someone faster....right now you get to claim the title (for the vee bottoms)...because I'm not in yet...enjoy it while it lasts...
...and you should be happy they're stock 1075s...if they weren't you'd be in real trouble...
and quit the Flamer ****
Last edited by WildThing47; 06-21-2012 at 10:53 AM.
06-21-2012 | 11:03 AM
#80
Gold Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1
From: Westport, CT
