New 496 class in Great lakes
#13
My original thought was to run the 496 in a factory 1 and 2 configuration. Keep the same specs on the hull but only allow the 496 with a XR drive.
I also think 5500 lbs is crazy. stick to factory rules on weights they seem to be right on.
MD
I also think 5500 lbs is crazy. stick to factory rules on weights they seem to be right on.
MD
#15
Well, the only mitigating aspect of 5500 lbs is that it would be a true off-the-showroom class: Fridge, daquiry-mixer, potti and the proverbial kitchensink.
I agree with MD: Factory rules (maybe a bit less stringent) and a 496. Somewhere in the mid 70s. Price likewise.
I agree with MD: Factory rules (maybe a bit less stringent) and a 496. Somewhere in the mid 70s. Price likewise.
#17
Registered
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 513
Likes: 1
From: EGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP, NJ
i don't mind the motor or the speeds but the wieght will killyou. you go into a corner full throttle and get out of shape at the least bit with that much weight your gonna spin or roll.
Treadwell
otherwise good idea and a lot cheaper.
Treadwell
otherwise good idea and a lot cheaper.
#19
What were the speeds when APBA was running E Class 2 years ago, were they running a 502. Formula also mention running the sportmaster drive. If anybody who was in Eastlake that still has a copy of the program I forget what the wieght was for twins.I left my copy in Marks truck. Eric I'm sure you can call someone at Formula for a copy.
#20
Registered

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,635
Likes: 13
From: Toms River NJ
The old "E" class was a 502, 415 horsepower engine. Speeds were in 69-72 mph. If this were to become a "National Class", it certainly has the "affordability" factor in its favor. It would also be ideally suited for anything 24'-26'. With some clubs allowing 30' twin engine boats in P5, this would be a true "entry level" class, and could easily be run with P5 and P4. I like this idea!
Last edited by Fast Shafts; 06-07-2003 at 12:17 PM.



