Att: P class teams
 

Some of the guys up here in NJ have been discussing how we can make the class designations easier to follow from the fans point of view. I know, I have been approached many times by fans to explain the numbering system and have also been told how confusing it is.

With that in mind what are your feelings about proposing a change back to A - E class?

ie: Performance A, Permormance B and so on.

We hope that SBI and APBA will consider this. If they do, we will be glad to change as well.

Re: Att: P class teams
 

It may not be important to the racers but it sure is to the fans and scorers.

Please support this small change, this one's for the fans.

Re: Att: P class teams
 

I agree, easier to follow.

Re: Att: P class teams
 

I like the A.B.C. format . Its great for the fans :D

Re: Att: P class teams
 

I totally agree....easier for scorers and fans to follow and it looks better too(A-66 looks better than P5-66).

Re: Att: P class teams
 

P5 - A
P4 - B
P3 - C
P2 - D
p1 - E
F = F

Actually, if you remember the old A-D class rules, this really works well.

Re: Att: P class teams
 

In past years it was slowest, so I think it should stay that way
I don't like slowest, let's call it least fastest :drink:

Re: Att: P class teams
 

Great idea, it worked before, it is a proven method for spectators to follow a race and distinguish each class alike. Bruce you da man :D

Re: Att: P class teams
 

Who's attending the APBA meeting later this month? OPA has agreed that if APBA makes the change, OPA will follow. Hopefully SBI would follow as well. Wadda ya think Frank?

Who'll be at the meeting that can put this on the agenda?

Re: Att: P class teams
 

I am still up in the air, trying to work it out. Shane B will be there