class 7 growth explosion!!
#11
Really hoped the class would be a spec class rather than a bracket class for flat out racing like SVL and supercat or even the small P1 class. Even if that means dropping the size down to 150 or less to keep it safe. Might be a good way to get APBA lake racers to transition to offshore.
Once the project gets going I bet OPA could probably leverage an OEM for good discounts from merc or evinrude, especially for a run of the mill engine. Either way glad to see its bringing new folks out to the sport and be great to see the boats run.
Will they run a full course? Might be neat to shorten the course and run them in front of the crowd between the larger heats.
Once the project gets going I bet OPA could probably leverage an OEM for good discounts from merc or evinrude, especially for a run of the mill engine. Either way glad to see its bringing new folks out to the sport and be great to see the boats run.
Will they run a full course? Might be neat to shorten the course and run them in front of the crowd between the larger heats.
#12
I respect you input and agree as long as teams realize there will be possible changes in the future to keep competition tight. Now is the time to put it all on the table of what the class is about.
#13
Registered
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Fair Haven, Michigan
I just read the rules and they seem pretty clear to me as published. Don't get me wrong spec classes are awesome but based on the track record of the SVL class it tends to get unduly expensive and limits class growth. I'm hoping we get a few C7's up to Michigan in hopes to draw more racers. Good luck guys!
#14
Registered
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
The problem with any type of “Spec” class racing is that people always find ways to beat the rules. The 60 mph break-out rule seems to be the best way to offer a level playing field that can’t be beat.
That alone should help attract more new entries into the class and help keep them active in the class for longer than just a season. If anyone wishes to race at over 60 mph, they should just move into the next faster class OPA offers and leave class 7 rules alone.
That alone should help attract more new entries into the class and help keep them active in the class for longer than just a season. If anyone wishes to race at over 60 mph, they should just move into the next faster class OPA offers and leave class 7 rules alone.
#15
Registered
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Toms River,NJ
The 60mph speed bracket rule was implemented with safety,parity,and cost in mind.We also wanted teams to be able to "run what you brung" to get the class going.The seven currently registered boats have engines ranging from 200-300HP.There is no doubt that having more horsepower can be a competitive advantage,but several other factors are important to running well:boat set up,reliability,and the ability of the driver and throttleman to work well together etc.With that being said, I think long term a stock 200hp outboard makes sense.
#17
Registered

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,211
Likes: 369
From: Plainville/Old Lyme, CT Boca Raton, FL
I think a standard 200hp 3 liter optimax would be a good spec engine. As far as cheating and making sure that nobody is cheating, its simple. Anybody who wants to accuse another racer of cheating can simply pay for a tear down and inspect of the accused cheaters engine.
#18
#20
The boats with the 3.0 engines will never be balanced as well as the ones with 2.5L engines. I guess that helps the no HP limit...I bet a boat with a 300pm on it gets spanked in the ocean. On my boat I went from 8in of setback to 10....made a huge difference. Going from a 2.5 to a 3.0 will make an even bigger one



