Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Pantera
Engine Poll >

Engine Poll

Notices
View Poll Results: Which engine option does the "Pantera Family" like best for useable 750hp?
8-71 blown 540 with carbs and intercooler
56.25%
Naturally aspirated (single carb) 632
43.75%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Engine Poll

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-25-2007 | 07:36 PM
  #1  
Dude! Sweet!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Default Engine Poll

OK, polls are fun. Just for fun, if I was going to re-power my 28 what would you guys support. I'd be looking for about 750hp. So, the two options I'm realistically considering are either a Blown 540 or an N/A 632.

What do you think? Pros and cons of each?
Dude! Sweet! is offline  
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 08:12 PM
  #2  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 358
From: Mansfield, TX
Default

Never been much on blowers......they tear down an engine too fast and I ain't got the money for that.
TexomaPowerboater is offline  
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 08:26 PM
  #3  
Elite Marine's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,658
Likes: 1
From: IL
Default

With a blower you don't need as radical of lift and won't beat the hell out of the valve train. A 540 with a blower would be extrememly low on boost and therefore very conservative on the wear and tear of the engine. A 632 on the other hand will require a huge cam and will crush the springs in 100 hours or less.

That's my opinion, but what do I know, I still can't go faster than 87!!!
Elite Marine is offline  
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 09:13 PM
  #4  
Dude! Sweet!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Default

Kirk, I'm only looking for 85 mph so I figured I could go with a couple hundred less hp!

Sorry dude I'm kidding.

I'm wondering how radical the valvetrain would have to be in a monster displacement N/A motor? 100 hour valve springs are a turn off, but once a year isn't terrible...
Dude! Sweet! is offline  
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 09:36 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 6
From: west palm beach FL,
Default

You Could Go With A 572 C.i Or A 600ci Motor And Be At That 750 Hp With No Problem 632 Is Over Kill More For The 13, 1400 Hp Motors Where The Guys Can Aford A Rebuild Every 50 To 100 Hours
mikebrls is offline  
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 09:36 PM
  #6  
Stormrider's Avatar
JC Performance Engines
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,904
Likes: 33
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Check out Zul's build on his 750.
I know Rick (onesickgladiator) had a pair in his gladiator and loved them.
He was getting 775 out of them.
I'd go NA and carbed... not efi.
http://www.zulracing.com/engines.htm
Stormrider is offline  
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 10:46 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
From: MIAMI WHERE ELSE
Default

Stay away from a 632 ci motor, the torque of a 4.750 stroke crank will destroy your drive. I run a 14-71 blower 6 lbs of boost with a mild solid roller cam 672 lift with a Bryant knifed edge 4.375 stroke crank 6.800 oliver rods, 4.600 bore. A 540 blower motor will be ideal to get you to 85+ with no problem.

Last edited by MIAMIBOYZ; 06-25-2007 at 10:49 PM.
MIAMIBOYZ is offline  
Reply
Old 06-26-2007 | 01:40 AM
  #8  
Dude! Sweet!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Default

I've got an Imco upper on the boat but I figured the big crank could be trouble and I've heard that the 632s have some "funny" stuff going on with the stroke in excess of the bore. So maybe I should assume a 598 n/a motor as option 2 (although the blower motor seems more popular at this point).
Dude! Sweet! is offline  
Reply
Old 06-26-2007 | 06:20 AM
  #9  
Pat McPherson's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 3
From: Ivoryton, CT
Default

I think you could bore and stroke your 454 to 496, bolt on a set good heads, and blower to make 750HP.
There are also lots of N/A 572s and 598s making 750+HP.

Personally, I'd bolt in a 600-650HP 540cube and live with 75-80mph. You won't be blowing up Bravo drives monthly.
__________________
Patrick

Last edited by Pat McPherson; 06-26-2007 at 06:25 AM.
Pat McPherson is offline  
Reply
Old 06-26-2007 | 07:25 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
From: MIAMI WHERE ELSE
Default

Originally Posted by Dude! Sweet!
I've got an Imco upper on the boat but I figured the big crank could be trouble and I've heard that the 632s have some "funny" stuff going on with the stroke in excess of the bore. So maybe I should assume a 598 n/a motor as option 2 (although the blower motor seems more popular at this point).


Again, a 598 ci motor is an over kill for the Bravo as well. It is 4.500 inch stroke which requires beafy heads and a cam that rocks the boat. Get a 540 blower in there and you will be amazed, ask Brian Stubblefield here on the board, he runs 92 mph with it.
MIAMIBOYZ is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.