Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Pantera
outdrive ratio >

outdrive ratio

Notices

outdrive ratio

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-21-2012 | 07:54 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Lake George, NY
Default

Hey Ironman! Do you want to participate in this years Lake George Performance Weekend Offshore Demonstration? Last year we had 3 Pantera's. If so, shoot me a pm.
Green Eyes is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2012 | 08:10 PM
  #12  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 39
From: lockport ny
Default

when is that? how many pantera boats you got coming so far this year?
88bullet is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-2012 | 11:43 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Bethel Island, CA
Default

what happens at an offshore demonstration? Name of a pokerrun or something.....
JAIME is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-2012 | 12:43 PM
  #14  
littledcsrodshop's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 3
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by tomcei
LOL. You got me

I was told by Imco that with all top speeds the same between the two ratio drives.( assume props were obviously changed to match equal top speed) that the 1:5 had a better "rolling torque". Basically the 1:5 would have slightly better acceleration.

Not sure why they say "rolling" when we are talking boats. It also seems slightly puzzling when you think about the gears and prop ratios as just a math formula and why there would be a difference in acceleration. I know with cars the rear end gear and the tire size can be changed to achieve the same results. I guess the prop speed and hydro action make the difference in slip or something. weird.

Any thoughts?
I think Chris (Ironman) has a valid point in what he was saying about more hydrodynamic drag as it does have to push more blades through the water in a given distance..
I would also imagine part of the reason a 28 single with the average drive height will usually run faster on top end with a proper set up 4 blade than say a 5 or even 6 blade.. There's ofcourse always exceptions due to many variables such as the drive height, weight, & the amount of tourqe the particular rig makes..

I'll add that just having that little bit of extra tourqe multiplication availible to the prop with a 1.5 over a 1.32 at "say" 800 ft lbs. comes out to an additional 112 ft lbs. if my math is correct.. It would make a differance of 14 ft lbs for every 100 that the engine makes.. Even though the prop pitch would be lower running a 1.36 over a 1.5 (lower pitch obviously being easier to push) you are still attempting to push the same diameter prop, which may add to the equation as well..

That being said I'm not so sure I would listen to a dude who doesn't even have a running boat, however I have stayed at a Motel 6 before so ??
littledcsrodshop is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-2012 | 07:34 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 151
From: Atlanta
Default

I believe both you and Chris are correct. I have talked to many people about this in the past few days. Imco, my engine builder, etc. The consensus is the same. Imco flat out said the acceleration would be sightly less even if the top speeds were the same. My engine builder said I probably wouldn't tell a difference. Pantera said the same. This all came about when I saw the SCX 1:35 pop up for sale last week.
tomcei is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-2012 | 09:05 PM
  #16  
littledcsrodshop's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 3
From: TN
Default

Either way dude, We both know your not exactly lacking in the torque category so you will be just fine with a 1.35... If you put a 1.5 on it you would probably be lighter on the stick through midrange anyways, and that brings all back to equal...

If you were making 550 ft lbs. the story would be a bit different..

In other words quit holding out and post the pics.. haha !!

All jokes aside you indeed have one of the coolest, classiest & cleanest 28's out there period, and I can't wait to here "she's wet againt"

And tell your neighbor "too tall jones" I said: Hello

Last edited by littledcsrodshop; 02-23-2012 at 09:17 PM.
littledcsrodshop is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-2012 | 05:14 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 151
From: Atlanta
Default

Too funny......I'm getting closer.

The drive I was looking at sold in less than a day .dang-it
tomcei is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-2012 | 08:16 AM
  #18  
Stormrider's Avatar
JC Performance Engines
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,904
Likes: 33
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Tom, how much $ would it have been to change it to a 1.5?
Stormrider is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-2012 | 04:30 PM
  #19  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 151
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by Stormrider
Tom, how much $ would it have been to change it to a 1.5?
Imco said 2500. to swap gears and set up. I believe it's all done in the lower. Found some used around that price also..

Anyway I'm still looking. Missed a pretty good deal.
tomcei is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.