Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   Powerquest (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/powerquest-49/)
-   -   05 300 Revenge (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/powerquest/146490-05-300-revenge.html)

Silverado 03-15-2007 07:52 AM

I drove several 300's with HO's and they all ran between 78-82 mph on gps and radar. These runs were all made on Lake Macatawa in Holland, MI. Some of the boats were loaded with options and others were stripped. I find it very hard to beleive that someone is seeing a true 87mph on stock 496 HO's. Most of the runs were made with 40 - 50 gallons of fuel and 1 or 2 people on board.




.

DRIPPINWETII 03-15-2007 07:59 AM


Originally Posted by Knot 4 Me (Post 2058498)
You sure this isn't a speedometer reading? I can't see this boat running much more than 80 MPH on stock HO's.

I would have to agree. :rolleyes:

Venomous 03-15-2007 09:52 AM

OK. 496 MAGs run approx. low to mid 70 and 496 MAG HOs run approx. mid to high 70.

How about the ride at those speeds (head on, trailing, quartering)? How is reentry? Is it a better overall ride than the Enticer?

Silverado 03-15-2007 12:13 PM

The 300 does all those things better than the 290. Don't get me wrong - the enticer was a great boat, but the 300 is a big improvement. The 290 would chine walk at higher speeds and didn't seem to "stick" as good on re-entry.

Another thing that is much better on the 300 is room in the engine compartment. The 290 was an absolute nightmare to try and do any mechanical work in.:D






.

DRIPPINWETII 03-15-2007 12:22 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Another thing that is much better on the 300 is room in the engine compartment.

There is a ton of room in the engine compartment. :D

Knot 4 Me 03-15-2007 12:47 PM


Originally Posted by Silverado (Post 2058754)
The 300 does all those things better than the 290. Don't get me wrong - the enticer was a great boat, but the 300 is a big improvement. The 290 would chine walk at higher speeds and didn't seem to "stick" as good on re-entry.

Another thing that is much better on the 300 is room in the engine compartment. The 290 was an absolute nightmare to try and do any mechanical work in.:D






.

Yeah, the 290's are a bit snug in front of the engines. That 300 engine compartment looks sweet.

Knot 4 Me 03-15-2007 12:49 PM


Originally Posted by Silverado (Post 2058503)
I drove several 300's with HO's and they all ran between 78-82 mph on gps and radar. These runs were all made on Lake Macatawa in Holland, MI. Some of the boats were loaded with options and others were stripped. I find it very hard to beleive that someone is seeing a true 87mph on stock 496 HO's. Most of the runs were made with 40 - 50 gallons of fuel and 1 or 2 people on board.




.

What was the first year for the 300?

Venomous 03-15-2007 02:17 PM

I can attest to the snugness of the 290 engine room. Changing spark plugs was/ is a PITA. The 300 engine room is a dream compared to the 290.

Good to hear the 300 rides so well. I thought my old 290 rode well and that is my barometer. I agree that at higher speeds the 290 would walk a little so it's good to hear the 300 has eliminated that tendency, especially since it runs at higher speeds.

I think the first 300 year was 2003. Maybe late 2002.

Slick02 03-15-2007 03:14 PM


Originally Posted by Knot 4 Me (Post 2058802)
What was the first year for the 300?

They were going to originally release them as 2000's if I'm not mistaken, and then had some issues and pushed back production. When I bought my 99 Vyper I was actually considering waiting for the release of the 30 and then it never materialized.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.