Will my truck pull a 32?
#361
Registered

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,820
Likes: 376
From: IL
sure if you had a 260 pq and bought a 288 sunny off course its going to be 2 feet longer,simple math.
#362
Gold Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Antioch, Il
#364
Registered

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,820
Likes: 376
From: IL
#367
Registered
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
I wanted a boat that would run high 70's-80. Bought a raylar kit and was gonna install on the PQ until research told me it would be a waste and I might see high 60's to low 70's. Needless to say a little more research ended up placing me in my 288 and it is now happy with the Raylar kit,CMI headers,and a whipple flash on the ECM sitting under the hatch!

Keep in mind most of my boating is done on more glassy lake conditions as we rarely get the type of chop here to let a hull break loss and fly so to speak like you big lake guys do.
Last edited by pachanga; 10-09-2010 at 10:24 AM.
#368
Registered

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 21
From: MID MI
Yes,It was a 260. High freeboard and heavy...All boils down to what kind of boating you like to do. The best I ever saw on my happy speedo was 62 or 63 in the PQ. Same conditions with the sunny were close to 70 on GPS. I would say that is pretty close to a 10MPH difference. The funny part is my wife does't like to bounce...wants a more stable ride. She likes the Sunny hands down over the PQ!
I wanted a boat that would run high 70's-80. Bought a raylar kit and was gonna install on the PQ until research told me it would be a waste and I might see high 60's to low 70's. Needless to say a little more research ended up placing me in my 288 and it is now happy with the Raylar kit,CMI headers,and a whipple flash on the ECM sitting under the hatch!
Keep in mind most of my boating is done on more glassy lake conditions as we rarely get the type of chop here to let a hull break loss and fly so to speak like you big lake guys do.
I wanted a boat that would run high 70's-80. Bought a raylar kit and was gonna install on the PQ until research told me it would be a waste and I might see high 60's to low 70's. Needless to say a little more research ended up placing me in my 288 and it is now happy with the Raylar kit,CMI headers,and a whipple flash on the ECM sitting under the hatch!

Keep in mind most of my boating is done on more glassy lake conditions as we rarely get the type of chop here to let a hull break loss and fly so to speak like you big lake guys do.
I'm gona go put my waders on for your next post
Last edited by AJ POWERPLAY; 10-09-2010 at 11:08 AM.
#369
Registered

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,820
Likes: 376
From: IL
Yes,It was a 260. High freeboard and heavy...All boils down to what kind of boating you like to do. The best I ever saw on my happy speedo was 62 or 63 in the PQ. Same conditions with the sunny were close to 70 on GPS. I would say that is pretty close to a 10MPH difference. The funny part is my wife does't like to bounce...wants a more stable ride. She likes the Sunny hands down over the PQ!
I wanted a boat that would run high 70's-80. Bought a raylar kit and was gonna install on the PQ until research told me it would be a waste and I might see high 60's to low 70's. Needless to say a little more research ended up placing me in my 288 and it is now happy with the Raylar kit,CMI headers,and a whipple flash on the ECM sitting under the hatch!
Keep in mind most of my boating is done on more glassy lake conditions as we rarely get the type of chop here to let a hull break loss and fly so to speak like you big lake guys do.
I wanted a boat that would run high 70's-80. Bought a raylar kit and was gonna install on the PQ until research told me it would be a waste and I might see high 60's to low 70's. Needless to say a little more research ended up placing me in my 288 and it is now happy with the Raylar kit,CMI headers,and a whipple flash on the ECM sitting under the hatch!

Keep in mind most of my boating is done on more glassy lake conditions as we rarely get the type of chop here to let a hull break loss and fly so to speak like you big lake guys do.
260s are heavy deep V boats where the 288 has a big pad on the bottom thats why you have more speed,less drag and you ride on top of the water not in it,theres always a give and take kind of thing,you gave up good ride in the rough and settled for af faster ride in smooth water.
Last edited by boatnt; 10-09-2010 at 11:20 AM.
#370
Registered
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Don't get me wrong..the PQ was a very nice,well built boat. I suspect to get those numbers a 260 would have to be in a pretty good chop where the sunny didn't need it as much to get up and go. This would explain my speed differences. The guy(boat was in Ohio on the great lakes) I bought my PQ from claimed he could run 70...I couldn't and believe me I kept the hammer down and tried various trim levels. The PQ was quite a bit more squirrelly than my Sunny at speeds above 60.
I must say that when crossing a good sized boat wake the sunny seems much smoother and more accomplished at it than my 260 was. Believe me my wife is a testiment to that!
I must say that when crossing a good sized boat wake the sunny seems much smoother and more accomplished at it than my 260 was. Believe me my wife is a testiment to that!






