Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Prop Talk
SSM Prop Rake Angle Question >

SSM Prop Rake Angle Question

Notices
Prop Talk

SSM Prop Rake Angle Question

Old 01-20-2012, 07:35 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Kelly O's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Auburn, New York
Posts: 1,262
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts
Default SSM Prop Rake Angle Question

Lets say you have two sets of 5 blade SSM props, same diameter, same pitch, but one is 16 degree rake and the other is 18 degree.

What would the potential performance differences be on a stepped vee hull ?

Last edited by Kelly O; 01-20-2012 at 07:36 AM. Reason: clarify
Kelly O is offline  
Old 01-20-2012, 08:14 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Splendora, TX
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I understand, the more Rake you have, the more bow lift. I may be wrong, but I think this would be an advantage for surface drives so you don't have to trim them up so much to get bow lift...I think.
UrbanDisturbance is offline  
Old 01-20-2012, 03:28 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
tcelano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Comparing apples to apples, the prop with less rake should be faster, provided the boat's cg position was optimized for it.

The advantage of the higher raked prop is that you can leave the cg further forward, which makes for nicer midrange running, but still carry the bow as the center of pressure moves aft at higher speeds.

The reason I say the lower rake should theoretically be faster, comparing optimized setups, is that 1) in order to create bow lift, you are actually pressing down on the drive, which causes the hull to have to make extra lift to compensate, which equates to more induced drag, and 2) the blade angle is further from parallel to the thrust axis, causing more of the power to be used up making rooster tail.

Given no setup and balance optimization, there is a good chance you could throw the higher rake prop on and go faster due to the extra bow lift, at least on a non-stepped hull.

On the stepped hull, it's going to be less prone to these issues, and I'd expect the lower rake prop to be faster all-around.
tcelano is offline  
Old 01-21-2012, 08:15 AM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Kelly O's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Auburn, New York
Posts: 1,262
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Thanks for the replies thus far.

Any experience with stepped vees and different rake angles ?
Kelly O is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 11:43 AM
  #5  
Offshoreonly Advertiser
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
bbladesprops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Princeton, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,873
Received 44 Likes on 11 Posts
Smile

tcelano is basically right on. Bow lift is actually made via leveraging the transom though, not the drive.
In short, higher rake angles do hold the water to the blades longer creating more reaction to positive trim. Because the water is staying on the blade longer as positive trim is added, the higher rake angles do create more drag. Drag is speeds largest enemy. However, if the wetted hull area is decreased by more bow lift, the drag induced by the higher rake angle propeller will be insignificant as compared to the lessened drag of the hull. Therefore you go faster.

It is difficult to say any one rake angle will create the best or most efficient ride on any one true V or stepped hull. I've seen it work both ways. Lower rakes should be faster but only if the boat carrys itself correctly. Some stepped hulls will run faster if the front step is released (can be tough to do).

One other thing. Multi stepped bottoms create very aerated water. Sometime higher rakes will harness some of the slip this water induces.

Brett
__________________
Brett Anderson / BBLADES Professional Propellers
920-295-4435 http://www.bblades.com/
[email protected]
bbladesprops is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 09:27 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,309
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Brett, you are the expert, but all of your analysis is on "basically larger rakes prove to have larger surface areas" resulting in "more water surface grab per revolution" hull to hull V or cat each must be tested accordingly in order to optimize speed or cruse or combo. Racing enters another field. Carry on my friend. ps all dia/and/pitch being equal for comparison sake.
I'CE is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 10:43 AM
  #7  
Offshoreonly Advertiser
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
bbladesprops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Princeton, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,873
Received 44 Likes on 11 Posts
Smile

Hi I'CE,

I didn't say higher rakes have more blade/surface area. I said as the rake angle increases the water stays attached to the blades longer as positive trim is added.

You are correct, each application takes on its own characteristics and needs to be aproached that way. Of course, experience can give you a little advantage. And indeed racing is a whole different ball game due to set up and CG.
I spent years with Race applications when I was at Mercury Racing. In those days we had quite the support team on wheels not to mention Lake X and the 2 movable boards of propellers we had on hand there at all times. Most of the recreational applications require a little different set of rules.

Brett
__________________
Brett Anderson / BBLADES Professional Propellers
920-295-4435 http://www.bblades.com/
[email protected]
bbladesprops is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.