Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Prop Talk
More prop or lower gear ratio? >

More prop or lower gear ratio?

Notices

More prop or lower gear ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-15-2014 | 08:34 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 402
From: Cheboygan, MI
Default More prop or lower gear ratio?

I just blew up my drive and I'm considering going from a 1.5 to 1.36. I currently run a Bravo 28p but I should be running at least a 30 or 32. At what point does increasing pitch start to become less efficient?
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 12:28 PM
  #2  
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 333
From: ankeny,ia.
Default

You're going the wrong way ( ratio wise) if you want to be able to run a larger prop with the same amount of power
JaayTeee is offline  
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 02:08 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 402
From: Cheboygan, MI
Default

My question is, should I get a bigger prop or go with a lower ratio? The 1.36 gears are stronger than the 1.5, but what combination gives me the best efficiency? Since the drive has to be rebuilt anyway now is a good time to ask this question. If I go with the 1.36, I can probably stay with the 28, If I go with the 1.5 I will need to step up to a 30 or 32 prop.
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 05:21 PM
  #4  
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 333
From: ankeny,ia.
Default

Are you under propped ?....if the 28 pitch prop is letting the engine run in the proper rpm range with a 1.5 ratio drive, and you change the drive ratio to 1.36 ( less gear reduction, faster prop shaft speed than the 1.5), you'll need to drop DOWN at least 1 size in pitch to maintain the same engine rpm.

If you are under propped and have about 1000 rpm left over, you could probably go to the 1.36 and use the 28 pitch prop.

Bravo's start to lose their efficiency above 32" pitch

Last edited by JaayTeee; 10-15-2014 at 05:26 PM.
JaayTeee is offline  
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 05:25 PM
  #5  
donzi matt's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 31
From: Moultonborough NH
Default

It sounds like what he is saying is he is over his RPM range on 1.5's so he would have to prop up. Instead of propping up he wants to change the ratio to 1.36 instead. It should work, but I have no idea what the difference in RPM would be.
donzi matt is offline  
Reply
Old 10-16-2014 | 06:17 AM
  #6  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 3
From: BERLIN, OHIO
Default

http://www.go-fast.com/sterndrive_gear_ratios.htm
sabo is offline  
Reply
Old 10-16-2014 | 08:46 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Default

a 28p to a 30p is about 400rpms difference, then 30-32 is about another 400rpms, so you are saying that you could be possibly over spinning 600-800rpms? what are you spinning now and what is your ideal rpm?
ealesh33 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-16-2014 | 09:39 PM
  #8  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 141
Default

It is generally more efficient to spin a large pitch prop slower than a smaller pitch prop faster. I'd keep the 1.5 and step up in pitch as required to match engine max HP rpm.
Trash is offline  
Reply
Old 10-16-2014 | 09:51 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton Or
Default

Originally Posted by Trash
It is generally more efficient to spin a large pitch prop slower than a smaller pitch prop faster. I'd keep the 1.5 and step up in pitch as required to match engine max HP rpm.
Intresting I ask this sincerely why do 1/4 mile boats use such small props? One more if I may can a prop go supersonic in water? Ahh why then as one goes up in HP do mfg's go down in ratio???? 375 hp with a 1.98 final?

Last edited by Pliant; 10-16-2014 at 09:54 PM.
Pliant is offline  
Reply
Old 10-16-2014 | 09:57 PM
  #10  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,345
Likes: 191
Default

Ask eddie knox if anybody can he has. (supersonic)
GLENAMY 242SS is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.