Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Scarab
Scarab 22 Performance comparison >

Scarab 22 Performance comparison

Notices

Scarab 22 Performance comparison

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-13-2009 | 04:22 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Angry Scarab 22 Performance comparison

Hi to all,
can anyone please suggest his point of view to the subject?

98 Scarab 22 big block engine (7.4 GI Volvo Pento 800hours) + with CMI headers + antifouling paint + 25 BBLade (4 blade high rake propller) shows poor performance (67 mph with gaffrig water pickup speedometer).

Engine compression ok.
Fuel injection system ok.

What kind of performance should i expect from this boat?
What would be the best idea of upgrade or ardjust?

Thanks in advance
maryokaan is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2009 | 09:28 PM
  #2  
Rookie's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,018
Likes: 1,521
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

My gaffrig water pickup speedo is in sync with my GPS. If you getting close to 67 I believe your doing great, especially with bottom paint. what are you expecting?
Rookie is offline  
Reply
Old 06-14-2009 | 04:07 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rookie
My gaffrig water pickup speedo is in sync with my GPS. If you getting close to 67 I believe your doing great, especially with bottom paint. what are you expecting?
I thought 75 or something after putting the headers....
because it was doing 70mph with stock engine and without any paint bottom...

which propeller are you using?
maryokaan is offline  
Reply
Old 06-14-2009 | 04:28 PM
  #4  
BY U BOY's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,779
Likes: 1
From: HOUSTON ,TX
Default

I would say you are right on par with a 7.4.
BY U BOY is offline  
Reply
Old 06-14-2009 | 10:59 PM
  #5  
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 51
From: Rockford, IL
Default

I had a 96 22 Scarab. With a 7.4MPI LX (330 hp) I hit a best of 70.6 GPS. Put in a 502 MPI (415hp) and hit a best of 74.1 GPS. No bottom paint and running a labbed 25P Mirage Plus. The boat was as clean as they come and ran it for many years. I learned a lot driving that boat faster than I should of in rough water. A blast to drive.
Revd Up is offline  
Reply
Old 06-14-2009 | 11:31 PM
  #6  
Fenderjack's Avatar
Pirate of the Chesapeake
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
From: North Point Creek, Md.
Default

I think that is pretty good, esp with bottom paint.. With out the paint I wouldn't doubt a 69-70 mph pass from it...
What rpm are you turning with that prop...??


John jr
Fenderjack is offline  
Reply
Old 06-15-2009 | 03:44 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for all the comments,

now it is turning 4250 rpm, if i try to trim up more, the propeller starts spraying but no speed up at all...
do you think i should try on a mirage 25?

What is the optimum rpm of my 7.4 gi engine at top speed?

THanks
maryokaan is offline  
Reply
Old 06-15-2009 | 07:12 AM
  #8  
Rookie's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,018
Likes: 1,521
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

Originally Posted by maryokaan
I thought 75 or something after putting the headers....
because it was doing 70mph with stock engine and without any paint bottom...

which propeller are you using?
Just adding headers without anything to the ineternals ie. cam and heads you will be getting minimal gains. The headers will help when and if you upgrade your power.

I'm running 25" Mirage, but my boat is a totally different animal compared to yours.
Rookie is offline  
Reply
Old 06-15-2009 | 07:31 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

I believe the main problem with the boat is what ever i do the boat`s hull has too much friction in the mid part (it does not matter how much trim up the boats bow does not come up as much as it should have) it goes more like a train in the water,
what could fix this problem?

More horsepower?
Different Prop? if yes which one?
to modify the hull?
to change the transom location?

thanks in advance
maryokaan is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-2009 | 09:32 AM
  #10  
outriggers's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: Clinton N.J.
Default

I would use GPS speed as a baseline. If you are getting 67 thats pretty good. If I remember right, I got low 60's out of a 7.4. Thats with a 25 mirage+. Doug
outriggers is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.