![]() |
Originally Posted by tinman565
(Post 3128786)
grrrr...I know that it was an option...lol. I wanna know WHAT made it a thunder as opposed to not being one. Engine size ? Shore power ? Refrigerator ? Pop-up cleats ?...lol. Keep working on it sir....I'm gonna start having to grade your work on a curve...hahaha. You figure this out, and the beers on me. :drink:
|
I believe Wellcraft made Vipers only in 1990 and 1991. My Viper is a Larry Smith. Can be seen in classifies.
|
Sorry. That was 1990-1993.
|
Here is my thunder. I am not sure what power came with it, it was repowered with HP500's. All the thunders that I have seen have this same paint even though I have seen one without the race cowl.
http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g2...100_0154-1.jpg |
Run em Hard....you still have that boat ? I'm curious about the ladder set up. Call me when you get a chance if you could. 716-807-4561 :drink:
|
First post, will add info as I can on Thunder. Boating magazine ran an article on the new "thunder" series of scarabs with the 31, 38 and a 43 I believe. it also showcased the SC line from mercruiser, the 525, 600, and 800 maybe? in each boat.
Wellcraft decided that the scarab line was becoming known as kind of bloated and fat, so they decided to come out with a line that had speed first as it's goal. They went on a diet to shave weight by removing some of the cruising niceities of the standard line. In addition, the Thunder hull used a new layup of bi and triaxial fiberglass including kevlar in the layup. coring was used in the deck and hull as well as microballons to fill in around the strakes and stringers I think. Of course, the graphics package and other items to make it feel different and racy always has to set apart a "class" I remember the test as each boat was basically a 80mph boat, which back in early 90's was big speed for a factory boat. I dreamed about those boats for years. So, yes the thunder package in the early 90's was different. It of course included the sticker package to set it apart, but it was a different layup at the time and a boat that was equipped to be lighter. Of course, who knows how long that lasted before every scarab was built to that standard or some of the features were removed and it became a simple sticker package, no difference once you got past the paint. But in the beginning, they said there was a difference. Do a google search on it and there are a few articles out there. Hope this helps, or maybe just adds to the confusion. Never owned an offshore boat, just dreamed about them constantly in college and read ALOT about them. No professional background or experience her, just my memory of articles. :party-smiley-004: Brian |
Originally Posted by befu
(Post 3315476)
Ff the standard line. In addition, the Thunder hull used a new layup of bi and triaxial fiberglass including kevlar in the layup.
Worked for a Scarab dealer on my off duty days in the 90s. We were told the "Thunder" option was a light layup hull |
Originally Posted by Run_em_hard
(Post 3131497)
Here is my thunder. I am not sure what power came with it, it was repowered with HP500's. All the thunders that I have seen have this same paint even though I have seen one without the race cowl.
http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g2...100_0154-1.jpg |
Originally Posted by Run_em_hard
(Post 3131497)
Here is my thunder. I am not sure what power came with it, it was repowered with HP500's. All the thunders that I have seen have this same paint even though I have seen one without the race cowl.
http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g2...100_0154-1.jpg |
Originally Posted by Okie guy
(Post 3527905)
Hello gentlemen. I am new to OSO. Your Thunder is still in beautiful condition. I also have a 31 thunder. It came with the twin HP500's from the factory. My graphics are different than this. My graphics spell out thunder down each side of the boat.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.