![]() |
I am redoing an 86 scarab panther that when i bought was a running bot and it ran well, but because i can't leave anythin alone and engine room floor/hull starting to delaminate in small area or should say thought was a small area, i removed the engines and trs assembly's and ended up replacing transon and stringers to the gas tank bulkhead. So with doing that i am convrting to bravo's with 3 up imco extension boxes and with the drives propshafts being 3 3/4" below the bottom and with -2 imco drives will be at 1 3/4" below the hull. This has made interesting for exhaust fitment. So after transom and stringers were done the bottom was redone. I am now getting ready to assemble the blocks with cms racing engines. Twin 502 ci 600hp a piece. My question is, has anyone played with prop rotation. I know trs can only spin one direction in forwad but anyone who has a bravo panther and have messed with props spinning in or out could you let me know your results please. Great work with all your panthers they look great!!!
Thanks hullofjustis |
You'll be happy with Tony@CMS. He is a straight shooter.
|
Tony Is a good friend. he does amazing work. He Has built a couple motors for me and a few blower motors for a friend and we have never had any failures.
|
Originally Posted by Car Biz
(Post 3834356)
jason what are you doing with the old cams?
|
4 Attachment(s)
Update:
So I finally got out to the shop and started tearing down 1 of the mills. Apparently I am a month behind on my timeline. It appears that the pistons are ~0.007"-0.010" in the hole. I couldn't find the dial indicator or depth mic. I will get a more accurate measurement later this week. It also it appears that I had a little reversion in this engine. It's hard to believe that it could pull water ~3' through dry to the tip Stainless Marine TRS tails. Another good reason for the cam swap. And the Isky solid roller lifters are looking great |
4 Attachment(s)
It appears the pistons are 0.014" in the hole. I pulled #2 main cap to check the bearings. They show some some witness of some wear in the middle. Nothing that I can feel.
|
5 Attachment(s)
The cam looks good also.
I didn't use a cam retaining plate and the button on the front of the cam wore down pretty good. It was walking forward into the timing chain cover. |
I have seen his work &I was not impressed :poopoo::angry-smiley-038::whistle:PS no professional courtsey:angry-smiley-038:
|
Originally Posted by acaruso
(Post 3851384)
i have seen his work &i was not impressed :poopoo::angry-smiley-038::whistle:ps no professional courtsey:angry-smiley-038:
|
Why do you say...
Originally Posted by Rookie
(Post 3843694)
Update:
It also it appears that I had a little reversion in this engine. It's hard to believe that it could pull water ~3' through dry to the tip Stainless Marine TRS tails. Another good reason for the cam swap. Hard to tell from the pix's but everything looks squeaky clean to me. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.