5 mph gain after Whipple install, something wrong??
#1
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 3
From: N. NJ, Eastern LI
30' Superboat Y2K
Motor-540 Merlin dynoed @ 600 hp @ 5700
Ran 81.5 mph @5400 RPM on GPS with 28p Bravo 1
Installed a 2.3 intercooled Whipple over the winter.
Went for a sea trial today and here's the results
30p Bravo 1........85 mph @ 5200 rpm with 5 lbs of boost
28p Bravo 1........86.3 mph@ 5700 rpm with 6 lbs of boost
I was hoping for more. Does this seem right??
These are GPS speeds. The Gaffrig liquid filled speedo read 90 mph.
Thanks
Motor-540 Merlin dynoed @ 600 hp @ 5700
Ran 81.5 mph @5400 RPM on GPS with 28p Bravo 1
Installed a 2.3 intercooled Whipple over the winter.
Went for a sea trial today and here's the results
30p Bravo 1........85 mph @ 5200 rpm with 5 lbs of boost
28p Bravo 1........86.3 mph@ 5700 rpm with 6 lbs of boost
I was hoping for more. Does this seem right??
These are GPS speeds. The Gaffrig liquid filled speedo read 90 mph.
Thanks
Last edited by Pure Energy; 04-02-2006 at 12:47 PM.
#3
I would think you would gain no less than 10mph, was there a dyno test after the whipple was installed?
__________________
AUTOCONNECTIONLLC.COM
AUTOCONNECTIONLLC.COM
#5
Registered
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Portland OR
Even a 3.3 is out of it's efficiency range on a 540. You will have to spin it up pretty hard, 14,000? max. SC rpm. Better yet, look for another 2.3 and intake and go with a quad rotor
Last edited by HP350SC; 04-01-2006 at 08:40 PM.
#6
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 3
From: N. NJ, Eastern LI
Originally Posted by HP350SC
Even a 3.3 is out of it's efficiency range on a 540. You will have to spin it up pretty hard, 14,000? max. SC rpm. Better yet, look for another 2.3 and intake and go with a quad rotor 

Is 5 lbs of boost from a 2.3 different from 5 lbs of boost from a 3.3?
#8
Originally Posted by Pure Energy
Is 5 lbs of boost from a 2.3 different from 5 lbs of boost from a 3.3?
You have to spin it too hard, and make too much heat. Your probably only making 700HP, instead of the 800+HP a 3.3 could make. Ask Dustin for more specifics.
Bottom line, you have too small a blower. Sorry-
Good news is the quad rotor idea is great. Thats what I have on my 540.
#9
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 3
From: N. NJ, Eastern LI
Originally Posted by zt260
Yes,
You have to spin it too hard, and make too much heat. Your probably only making 700HP, instead of the 800+HP a 3.3 could make. Ask Dustin for more specifics.
Bottom line, you have too small a blower. Sorry-
Good news is the quad rotor idea is great. Thats what I have on my 540.
You have to spin it too hard, and make too much heat. Your probably only making 700HP, instead of the 800+HP a 3.3 could make. Ask Dustin for more specifics.
Bottom line, you have too small a blower. Sorry-
Good news is the quad rotor idea is great. Thats what I have on my 540.
#10
Originally Posted by zt260
Yes,
You have to spin it too hard, and make too much heat. Your probably only making 700HP, instead of the 800+HP a 3.3 could make. Ask Dustin for more specifics.
Bottom line, you have too small a blower. Sorry-
Good news is the quad rotor idea is great. Thats what I have on my 540.
You have to spin it too hard, and make too much heat. Your probably only making 700HP, instead of the 800+HP a 3.3 could make. Ask Dustin for more specifics.
Bottom line, you have too small a blower. Sorry-
Good news is the quad rotor idea is great. Thats what I have on my 540.



