Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
32activethunder  vs  33powerplay >

32activethunder vs 33powerplay

Notices
General Boating Discussion

32activethunder vs 33powerplay

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-18-2006 | 11:51 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 6
From: west palm beach FL,
Default 32activethunder vs 33powerplay

i'm looking at a 32 active thunder and a 33 powerplay both are 1998.
has anybody ben in both how do the ride's compare ?
any info that you mite have will be great .
build quility,handling and of course rough water ride.

THANK'S
MIKE
mikebrls is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2006 | 02:35 AM
  #2  
Semper Fi's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 8
From: SoCal
Default Re: 32activethunder vs 33powerplay

33' Powerplay will have a better rough water ride. Cabin space might be bigger in the A/T. Either way, I think they are both great boats.
Semper Fi is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2006 | 06:05 AM
  #3  
Indy's Avatar
Member #154
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,999
Likes: 1,066
From: SW CT & Long Island Sound
Default Re: 32activethunder vs 33powerplay

Hard to go wrong with either boat. Like Semper said, the AT will have some more cabin headroom if that's important to you. I've never been in an AT, but I can attest to the incredible rough water ride of the PP, super build quality too. 1997 and above PPs are the last refinement of the 33' Sportdeck line, so you'll have the latest version of the boat. Good luck!!
Indy is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2006 | 09:01 AM
  #4  
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 3
From: N. NJ, Eastern LI
Default Re: 32activethunder vs 33powerplay

I think the PP has a unique look to it. The AT looks like a Sonic
Pure Energy is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2006 | 02:49 PM
  #5  
cigarette38topgun's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Default Re: 32activethunder vs 33powerplay

I like the Powerplay myself....but both boats are damn nice....can't go wrong either way!
cigarette38topgun is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2006 | 04:48 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 6
From: west palm beach FL,
Default Re: 32activethunder vs 33powerplay

thank's
mikebrls is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2006 | 08:27 PM
  #7  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Default Re: 32activethunder vs 33powerplay

Never been on either, but it looks like you ride ON a Powerplay; whereas you ride IN an AT.
dave911 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2006 | 08:29 PM
  #8  
ActiveThunder's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 10
From: Pompano Beach, Florida
Default Re: 32activethunder vs 33powerplay

Mike,

Same ride, very, very similar hulls.

Speeds are the same if the weights are the same.

Big difference, you can trade the 32 in for a 33, 37, or 43 when you want to move up! And you know where to find us.

Call me if you need any info on what you are looking at.

Pat.


Originally Posted by mikebrls
i'm looking at a 32 active thunder and a 33 powerplay both are 1998.
has anybody ben in both how do the ride's compare ?
any info that you mite have will be great .
build quility,handling and of course rough water ride.

THANK'S
MIKE
ActiveThunder is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2006 | 08:56 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 6
From: west palm beach FL,
Default Re: 32activethunder vs 33powerplay

thank's pat
mikebrls is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2006 | 08:07 AM
  #10  
KAAMA's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 107
From: Western Michigan
Default Re: 32activethunder vs 33powerplay

Both hulls are hard core...speed, looks, and ride. I was considering buying a local 33' PP here in my area before I bought my 32' A/T in 2000. The 33' PP had a pair of 556cid supercharged engines in it ready to go while the A/T had a pair of naturally aspirated 468cid engines that were broke.

I had my own personal pros/cons, and choices, but a couple of reasons why I bought the A/T is because it had more engine room space for working on/getting at the engines if needed, and how the back support of the back seat is integrated with the engine hatch and goes up when the hatch is raised and really opens up the engine compartment nicely when you need to get at the engines. This isn't the case with the 33' PP....it looked very tight in the engine compartment vs the 32' A/T and when I looked in the PP with those huge supercharged engines looked like they were bulging out of the engine compartment.

I like the PP they are nice riding hulls and I really like the looks of them, but you'd almost have to stand on your head to even attempt to accomplish anything simple in the engine compartment---especially with the maintenance required by supercharged engines.

Also, when standing at the helm of an A/T I felt like I was really IN the boat and safe. I couldn't say that about the early style 33' PP I was looking at, but I know they have redesigned the deck since then and have raised it up.

Anyway, it will give you something to think about when making your choice between the two boats. I am sure you'll buy the boat that you think is right for you.
KAAMA is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.