what do you guys think of this sbc build for my chevelle?
#1
BobL is doing an engine for my chevelle. 350 bored out .040, forged pistons, arp rod bolts, standard rods, cast crank. sportsman 2 heads, comp cam 280h magnum, edlebrock rpm intake, and probably a 750 holley on top.
i wont spin it past 6,000. what do you guys think of the build? he thinks we will hit 400+hp at 6k.
its going in my 72 chevelle.
i wont spin it past 6,000. what do you guys think of the build? he thinks we will hit 400+hp at 6k.
its going in my 72 chevelle.
#2
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 3,667
From: On A Dirt Floor
Close. I'd say 360-375. That same build was done hundreds or thousands of times about 10 yrs ago when these heads where 'the thing to have' and those Magnum cams where one of the few choices.
Not saying this badly - it's an older (not ancient) tech motor that will run pretty good. It's a good package on a budget.
Here's a comparison of the same build but modern Hyd roller in same neighborhood.
http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Dy...2HR-10_001.asp
Not saying this badly - it's an older (not ancient) tech motor that will run pretty good. It's a good package on a budget.
Here's a comparison of the same build but modern Hyd roller in same neighborhood.
http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Dy...2HR-10_001.asp
#3
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 3,667
From: On A Dirt Floor
Ooops - I made a big mistake above. I did not account for compression - stupid me - and since you did not give it I'll turn my answer into a 'I dunno.'
#5
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 3,667
From: On A Dirt Floor
I can't measure thru the computer. Have Texan Bob
let you know.
Anyway - if you end up around 10:1 to 10.5:1 then you will have your 400hp. This is how we ran'm at first, then with a 125shot, and then a 250 shot.
Again, it's a good package for the budget. Many still being built today...as is yours.
Hope you have fun with it - you should.
let you know.Anyway - if you end up around 10:1 to 10.5:1 then you will have your 400hp. This is how we ran'm at first, then with a 125shot, and then a 250 shot.
Again, it's a good package for the budget. Many still being built today...as is yours.
Hope you have fun with it - you should.
#7
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 3,667
From: On A Dirt Floor
Bob - if your reading this, I'm sorry. Please forgive me. LOL !
What I do, or people I know do, are our decisions. If we pay the piper, so be it.
If it would kill you if you busted something right off the batt, no, don't do it.
If you couldn't give a rats azz if it grenaded, then go do it.
What I do, or people I know do, are our decisions. If we pay the piper, so be it.
If it would kill you if you busted something right off the batt, no, don't do it.
If you couldn't give a rats azz if it grenaded, then go do it.
#9
Registered

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 3
From: Spicewood, Texas USA
It's a real close to 10:1 compression. What Jason wanted was a 383 with hydraulic roller, this is what the checkbook wanted.. LOL. I don't think I'd run nitrous on it. The rods are stock 350, just good bolts which is the weakest link. If you want more power you need to build for it now! You break a crank or rod and you'll probably destroy every piece in it. Decide quick, the crank is going in today.
#10
Originally Posted by bobl
Decide quick, the crank is going in today. 

Keep it going!!
(I promise i wont change my mind anymore
)if it was for the boat, it would have been the 383 roller
but its just the chevelle. Im going to order the 3000 stall converter.


