Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Baja
Baja Quality >

Baja Quality

Notices

Baja Quality

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-04-2009 | 09:30 PM
  #1  
CWE
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Arlington TX
Default Baja Quality

Hello, I am trying to see if anyone can tell me thru out Baja's manufacturing how does the quality differ from the late 80's to early 90's and just after Brunswick took over. Then to late 90's and then in the 2000's. I own a Baja and know alot of boaters, the ones that do not own Baja's say they are the Bayliners of sportboats and would never own one. I do not see it. I know they are not top of the line but I would say way above average quality. I have heard from other Baja's owners that 1998 and 1999 were their best quality work and some say 2001. How true is that?

I am looking for a bigger Baja like a 33 OL - 38 ft range and wonder how different the ride would be from a 29 OL to a 33 OL. A couple of 33 OL owners tell me buy a 1999 33 OL and won't be dissappointed in the handling, rough water ride and quality. They said the 33 OL in the late 90's was the best hull design Baja built. Why would 1999 be any different than 2001 or 2004. Thanks for the advice and I thought here would be a good place to get some straight up answers.

Last edited by CWE; 03-05-2009 at 12:11 AM.
CWE is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2009 | 09:41 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Naperville, IL
Default

Originally Posted by CWE
Hello, I am trying to see if anyone can tell me thru out Baja's manufacturing how does the quality differ from the late 80's to early 90's and just after Brunswick took over. Then to late 90's and then in the 2000's. I own a Baja and know alot of boaters, the ones that do not own Baja's say they are the Bayliners of sportboats and would never own one. I do not see it. I know they are not top of the line but I would say way above average quality. I have heard from other Baja's owners that 1998 and 1999 were their best quality work and some say 2001. How true is that?

I am looking for a bigger Baja like a 33 OL - 38 ft range and wonder how different the ride would be from a 29 OL to a 33 OL. A couple of 33 OL owners tell me buy a 1999 33 OL and won't be dissappointed in the handling, rough water ride and quality. They said the 33 OL in the late 90's was the best hull design Baja built. Why would 1999 be any different than 2001 or 2004. Thanks for the advice and I thought here would be a good place to get some straight up answers.
They are entry level sport boats. As far as a measure of quality, its hard to get unbiased opinions, especially in a Baja forum.

There seems to be a large group that hates Baja, especially if they own a Checkmate. Generally, I think the quality is above what many non-owners believe, but its still no Cig or Pantera.

There are many ex Baja employees on here, and Im sure they can chime in regarding what years were the best. As an aside, many believe Sea Ray is some sort of quality pinnicle for the boat market. From what I understand, the Bucyrus Baja plant was producing some of Sea Rays smaller run-abouts. Again, I am sure one of the ex Baja guys can confirm or disprove that.

Last edited by Tristar Racing; 03-05-2009 at 06:34 PM.
Tristar Racing is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2009 | 09:49 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers,FL
Default

I've been beating the sh*t out of my '98 since it was new, and have no complains at all about quality. Can't really say for any other year, but I'm happy with mine and when we do upgrade, I'll probably keep it too.
wantingmore is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2009 | 11:13 AM
  #4  
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 333
From: ankeny,ia.
Default

I really don't know why a 99' 33 would
be any more desireable than any other
year of production.

I have had a little seat time in a couple 99' 33's,
they really didn't seem any different than my 02' 33


Personally, I would look for an 02' or newer.

The X dimension was raised around then.

And the popular power for these boats seem to
be 496 HO's....they run well with that power.

I've never had any quality issues with any of the
4 Baja's that I've had going back to 92'.

I would have liked to see a little better job done
in the rigging department though.

The 33 is a great all around boat, it handles
the rough water ok, it seems well balanced,
and it's fairly nimble, and it's not too big to trailer.
JaayTeee is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2009 | 04:47 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

My understanding is that they raised the X when they went with the 496s.
My boat with stock 502s (2000) was about 2-3 mph slower than a buddy's 04 with 496s.
pwam1 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Knot 4 Me
Baja
20
02-25-2008 07:02 AM
perform330
General Q & A
6
02-06-2008 09:32 AM
288sunny
Baja
5
03-22-2007 07:22 PM
mpally
General Boating Discussion
95
10-04-2006 11:32 PM
TEAMBAJA
General Boating Discussion
21
04-29-2003 09:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.