Any input on these INTAKES???
#1
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Has anyone ever run these intakes or simular. I noticed ebay is loaded with several different intakes and just wondered if anyone has used any of them. Compared to a Dart or Victor Jr.?????
I am not starting a thread on which is the best intake on the market but rather if anybody has used these or simular to.
Thanks,
John
http://cgi.ebay.com:80/ebaymotors/BBC-CHEVY-Polished-Aluminum-Intake-454-Oval-Manifold_W0QQitemZ330335827190QQcmdZViewItemQQptZM otors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories?hash=item4ce98cb 4f6&_trksid=p4506.c0.m245&_trkparms=65:1|39:1|240: 1318
I am not starting a thread on which is the best intake on the market but rather if anybody has used these or simular to.
Thanks,
John
http://cgi.ebay.com:80/ebaymotors/BBC-CHEVY-Polished-Aluminum-Intake-454-Oval-Manifold_W0QQitemZ330335827190QQcmdZViewItemQQptZM otors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories?hash=item4ce98cb 4f6&_trksid=p4506.c0.m245&_trkparms=65:1|39:1|240: 1318
#2
Registered
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 3
From: Fredericksburg, Va
I put together a low $$ race car for my son a few years ago, we used a professional products intake that was knock off of a victor JR worked very well car was faster than I figured it would be with the parts we used, decent intake for the price, now we did clean up the ports and matched to a felpro gasket...Rob
#3
Registered
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, Co.
I have a Pro Products intake on my '64 Falcon 'vert, good quality, no issues with it. I installed one on my CVX-18 years ago and had no problems with it either. Lower porosity = stronger casting due to being cast in steel molds rather than sand. Better cooling with the rear crossover port. From what I remember, one of the owners is a former Edelbrock design engineer.
#6
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Thanks guys,
i was a little concerned with the port size which is larger on the intake according to their measurements given than that of my chevy 049's oval ports. without looking at the moment it seems like the port size on the intake is 2.0 X 1.85 and the heads are 2.0 X 1.61. not a huge difference however i had hoped for it to be the other way around as Jim Valako is doing the heads and didn't plan to open the size any larger on the head ports. any thoughts...
once again,
thanks,
john
i was a little concerned with the port size which is larger on the intake according to their measurements given than that of my chevy 049's oval ports. without looking at the moment it seems like the port size on the intake is 2.0 X 1.85 and the heads are 2.0 X 1.61. not a huge difference however i had hoped for it to be the other way around as Jim Valako is doing the heads and didn't plan to open the size any larger on the head ports. any thoughts...
once again,
thanks,
john
#7
Registered
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,914
Likes: 1
From: Lake Conroe, TX.
it will increase your velocity into the head. What displacement engine. Anythig 502+- and lower, this is the best bang for the buck. Just order new ones though from JEGS. Sometimes I get used intakes with some warpage etc and they won't seal right. I don't buy them any more. Not worth the hassle.
1" open spacer helps also but only on the far end of the range.
Good luck
1" open spacer helps also but only on the far end of the range.
Good luck



