Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > Trucks, Trailers and Transportation
Chev Avalanche 2500 limitations? >

Chev Avalanche 2500 limitations?

Notices

Chev Avalanche 2500 limitations?

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-13-2010 | 09:47 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default Chev Avalanche 2500 limitations?

I own a 2003 Avalanche 2500 with an 8.1 with 3.73 rear axle, book rates at 10,000 lbs towing capability. The same truck with 4.10 gears was rated at 12,000 lbs. I'm looking at buying a Formula 353 fastech which weights 12,000 lbs on the trailer. My queston - Can I get away with 3.73 gears when my towing distance is short and occassionally 200 miles or less (flatland / no mountains)? I'm going to check to ensure the truck has adequate braking because I don't know if the Avalanche with 4.10s were any different in this respect. Both were GVWR of 8600lbs. Any information or opinions would be appreciated. Thanks Greg
gregm35 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2010 | 10:01 AM
  #2  
Strip Poker 388's Avatar
Rob
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,637
Likes: 9
From: Ms
Default

I have a buddy that tows a 42 Fountain with one all the time.Just make sure you have good brakes on the trailer.
__________________
.

The Only Time You Have To Much Ammo Is When Your Swimming Or On Fire.
Strip Poker 388 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2010 | 10:03 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 728
Likes: 1
From: Naples, Fl
Default

The two answers I always have to this question:
1. You can pull it with anything you like. It's the stopping that worries me. In my limited recollection, I believe the Avalanche with the 4.10 rear also had bigger brakes. However, don't rely on my memory.

2. Even if you're comfortable with the towing capacity and the stopping power of your rig, what happens if the unthinkable happens ? You're towing with a rig that's rated below the combined weight of your boat / trailer combo. Your insurance company will use that as a valid excuse to deny any claims / liability and leave you personally on the hook for all claims related to an accident.

T
MegaByte*3 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2010 | 10:51 AM
  #4  
Sydwayz's Avatar
Forum Regulator
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
VIP Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24,203
Likes: 1,592
From: Worldwide
Default

I don't believe they had bigger brakes. Easiest thing to do would be look up parts online for the different configurations and see if they are different part numbers.

That said, I have experience towing 12,000 lbs. with a 2500 Avalanche (with 4.10 gears). I have made a lot of posts about this truck here in the past. There are some things you can bolt on to make it tow better.

In my experience, it will tow it adequately, but not expertly; and I can't tell you for how long. I had a Class-V hitch and a weight distribution setup, and I still saw that my frame was sagging when loaded aft of the rear axle. I didn't like what I saw so I sold it and went to a 1-ton dually.
Attached Thumbnails Chev Avalanche 2500 limitations?-dsc01016s.jpg   Chev Avalanche 2500 limitations?-p9070393_edited.jpg  
Sydwayz is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2010 | 03:10 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 7
From: Sandown, NH - Sebago Lake Region, ME
Default

Originally Posted by Sydwayz
I don't believe they had bigger brakes. Easiest thing to do would be look up parts online for the different configurations and see if they are different part numbers.

That said, I have experience towing 12,000 lbs. with a 2500 Avalanche (with 4.10 gears). I have made a lot of posts about this truck here in the past. There are some things you can bolt on to make it tow better.

In my experience, it will tow it adequately, but not expertly; and I can't tell you for how long. I had a Class-V hitch and a weight distribution setup, and I still saw that my frame was sagging when loaded aft of the rear axle. I didn't like what I saw so I sold it and went to a 1-ton dually.
That 1-ton looks softer in the a$$ then the Ava?
502ss is offline  
Reply
Old 06-14-2010 | 08:45 PM
  #6  
Sydwayz's Avatar
Forum Regulator
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
VIP Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24,203
Likes: 1,592
From: Worldwide
Default

It's not.

Both have airbags installed in the pictures.

The AV pic is on flat land. It also has weight distribution bars installed.
The F350 pic is at the top of a (fairly steep) launch ramp, as such the truck is squatting a bit due to suspension pre-load.

Those are also different trailers. My Myco carries more tongue weight than my McClain, not to mention being a bit heavier.
Attached Thumbnails Chev Avalanche 2500 limitations?-p9070391_edited.jpg  

Last edited by Sydwayz; 06-14-2010 at 08:52 PM.
Sydwayz is offline  
Reply
Old 06-15-2010 | 04:04 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,728
Likes: 8
From: Troy, Mich
Default

502SS:

The first thing is to get a set of Firestone Air Bags and install. This will help immensley. Second replace factory hitch receiver with a Reese, Putnam or some other HD hitch. Factory hitch is a POS. Finally get electric or electric over hydraulic brakes on trailer. Do not use surge brakes- they are terrible. The real reason the drop from 12k to 10k is the gearing and the strain it puts on the tranny. I have 4.10 in mine and I pull a 30 ft Chris Cat on a Myco steel trailer pushing the 12 k limit. Once I got the air bags and electric brakes set up it is a breeze. You know its there but no sway at all and the air bags smoothed out the ride for the truck and boat over Michigans lousy roads. The brakes are the same on the 3.73 and 4.10 axles- they are full floating 14 bolt rear axles on the 2500. The 2500 will run better with a Hypertech tune job also... more rpm available from 4000 and up.

Wannabe
wannabe is offline  
Reply
Old 06-15-2010 | 07:29 PM
  #8  
Sydwayz's Avatar
Forum Regulator
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
VIP Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24,203
Likes: 1,592
From: Worldwide
Default

Don't forget the rear axle spacers and going to 8 or 9" wide wheels.
Sydwayz is offline  
Reply
Old 06-15-2010 | 07:59 PM
  #9  
t500hps's Avatar
21 and 42 footers
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,207
Likes: 146
From: Richmond VA
Default

I was using a 2500 suburban with 3.73 (but the 6.0 motor) as a tow vehicle for a 312 fastech....which is only 500 lbs lighter than the 353. It did OK but it was all I wanted to haul. I figured the gearing and TQ of the bigger motor/gears raised the tow rating but I had everything needed to STOP the 12,000 lbs load. If you really want to keep using that truck then follow the advice already given and as with anything, drive responsibly.
t500hps is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-2010 | 09:47 AM
  #10  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Hendersonville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by MegaByte*3
The two answers I always have to this question:
1. You can pull it with anything you like. It's the stopping that worries me. In my limited recollection, I believe the Avalanche with the 4.10 rear also had bigger brakes. However, don't rely on my memory.

2. Even if you're comfortable with the towing capacity and the stopping power of your rig, what happens if the unthinkable happens ? You're towing with a rig that's rated below the combined weight of your boat / trailer combo. Your insurance company will use that as a valid excuse to deny any claims / liability and leave you personally on the hook for all claims related to an accident.

T

Well said!

What tranny does the avalanche have. If it has an Allison you will have good engine braking, but not sure it was available in the avalanche. All Duramax diesels have 3.73 ratios, and the torque in the 8.1 is a little less that the diesel but a 3.73 should be adaquit. Without the Allison tranny I would be make sure you had good braking.

just my .02
Tow-N-One is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.