Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Baja
242 6.2 versus 8.1? >

242 6.2 versus 8.1?

Notices

242 6.2 versus 8.1?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-22-2010 | 01:35 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Default 242 6.2 versus 8.1?

A friend is looking at a 242 with 6.2 and 8.1 Mag. What kind of speed differences? Is the 6.2 been a good motor? What are some of your opinions on the two boats?

Thanks
bsboss is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-2010 | 02:26 PM
  #2  
Quinlan's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 772
From: Tulsa, GLOC
Default

Big block NO question
Quinlan is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-2010 | 04:42 PM
  #3  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Carrollton, Ky
Default

My neighbor/best friend has had a 242 with the 6.2 in it for about 6 years now. It's been a great boat with not one problem yet. It really depends on what your after I think. If top speed is your goal, I wouldn't recommend it. His boat is a solid high 50's boat on it's best day, cruise speed is in the 40s. It's great for just cruising around and pulling water toys for his kid.
rumrunner29 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-2010 | 06:48 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,957
Likes: 1
From: www.bajaboatowners.com
Default

Keep in mind how long you want to keep it if topspeed isn't your concern 6.2 will kill you in resale. Most people will choose a BB 9 out of 10 times.
Irishtornado is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-2010 | 07:54 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Evansville,Indiana
Default

I would think that 6.2 would drink more fuel than the B.B. at the same r.p.m.
3rdtimesthecharm is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-2010 | 09:58 PM
  #6  
Ebay Ed's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
Default

like the old drag race saying there is no replacement for displacement
__________________
www.bajaboatowners.com
Ebay Ed is offline  
Reply
Old 09-23-2010 | 11:52 AM
  #7  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 2
From: Northern, KY (Cincinnati) Lake St Clair, MI Norris Lake, TN
Default

As much as I would like my ride to be newer, faster, bigger, etc, etc we all have a budget.

They're both good motors. I would let it come down to entry price. All things equal then go with the 8.1. As far as resale goes, I don't think the 6.2 would kill you in a 24' bowrider like it would in a 302 or 29OL.
Baja_342 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-23-2010 | 02:37 PM
  #8  
mcourson's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: New Haven, IL
Default

8.1 all the way. The 242 is very heavy for it size. It weighs the same as a 275.

62 was the best i saw on wish o meter with 8.1. That was 3 blade. It was unstable and i had to use tabs and trim to control it. Switch to 4 blade and it was very stable but lost 2mph.

With 5 or 6 people, the boat was slow to plane with tabs down. It was better with 4 blade. I would like to think it would be worse with 6.2 as you can't turn the same prop. It needs the torque of the bigger motor.
mcourson is offline  
Reply
Old 09-23-2010 | 02:43 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Default

I've never heard anyone say that they wish they had a smaller motor! I have a beefed up 454cu in my 252 and I see an honest 62 in chop with a labbed 23p mirage plus. I vote 8.1 all the way.
tknnd is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.