Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Crane Hydraulic Roller #169651 >

Crane Hydraulic Roller #169651

Notices

Crane Hydraulic Roller #169651

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-21-2010 | 11:10 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Default Crane Hydraulic Roller #169651

Refreshing from mechanical solid to hydraulic roller.
Combination is 572ci, 12-71, intercooler, Dart, big stellings, dominators, etc.
I would appreciate comments regarding performance from anyone running this cam in a similar combination.
Good choice...or..?
Thank you.
TX3x2gun is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2010 | 07:28 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 3
From: Fredericksburg, Va
Default

Bob @ marine kinectics
ezstriper is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2010 | 01:02 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks...I talked to Bob......he is the man!
TX3x2gun is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2010 | 01:54 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TX3x2gun
Thanks...I talked to Bob......he is the man!
WELL ????????????????????
Jeff P31 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-2010 | 06:33 AM
  #5  
PatriYacht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 3
From: Waterford,MI
Default

Seems like a good choice. What did Bob say?
PatriYacht is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-2010 | 07:07 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Default

Bob's comments were all positive.
He thought a bit more lift would be the only change he would recommend, but agreed that for my use, (heavy boat, mostly cruising at 4200-4800, and no constant "hammer down" for all-out mph) the combination would work great.
Maximum torque at 5600-5800 sealed the deal.
No stud girdle required, no reversion.
Install at 114.
TX3x2gun is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-2010 | 11:34 PM
  #7  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 20
From: Millstadt, IL
Default

Originally Posted by TX3x2gun
Bob's comments were all positive.
He thought a bit more lift would be the only change he would recommend, but agreed that for my use, (heavy boat, mostly cruising at 4200-4800, and no constant "hammer down" for all-out mph) the combination would work great.
Maximum torque at 5600-5800 sealed the deal.
No stud girdle required, no reversion.
Install at 114.
Do you mean max HP? Peak torqe is lower than HP.
jeffswav is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2010 | 01:01 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown, TX
Default

What are the specs on this cam?
Griswald is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2010 | 09:15 AM
  #9  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 94
From: yorkville,il
Default

i have that cam in 4 engines,and love it.great midrange,and top end,and a sweet idle.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2010 | 09:18 AM
  #10  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 94
From: yorkville,il
Default

if you installed intake centerline at 114,you NEED to change it.put it in at 108.the lobe split is 114 ,i have the cam card,intake centerline is at 108.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.