Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Scarab
29 with twin's or single ??????? >

29 with twin's or single ???????

Notices

29 with twin's or single ???????

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-09-2011 | 08:43 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 6
From: west palm beach FL,
Default 29 with twin's or single ???????

so what everyone's thought on a late model 1995 to 2002 29 with either a single bigblock 575hp or twin 350 mag motor's, and of course what the top speed of each would be .
question 2.
would the 2 350 mpi motor's be more efficient then a single 540 ci. carb,motor ?

thank's
mike
mikebrls is offline  
Reply
Old 03-09-2011 | 08:58 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Laplace,LA
Default

Mike,
I have 1996 with a single 509mpi with a 2.3 whipple making about 620hp. I love it, best so far has been 73ish and its not that bad on gas if you stay out of the BOOST! I'm not positive but I believe in stock form the Mags will run 70 and probably be easier on drives.
Scott

Last edited by fast22; 03-09-2011 at 09:10 PM.
fast22 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 07:33 AM
  #3  
Knot 4 Me's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 797
From: Central IL
Default

Twins.
Knot 4 Me is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 10:28 AM
  #4  
spazboz's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 5
From: Zeeland, Michigan
Default

I like-a da' twins myself. My 26 Nova has twins.
spazboz is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 03:12 PM
  #5  
trc2's Avatar
scarab
15 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Easton Maryland
Default

twins over a single by far
trc2 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 08:44 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
From: Wilson, NY
Default

I agree on twins. Easier to dock...probably less maintenance than the one "big" motor...and if one has a problem, you can always get back with the other motor.

I could be wrong, but I'd be surprised if it went 70 with the mags. Might be close (I'm gonna guess 65-67ish) but I dont think it'll run 70.
tinman565 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 09:03 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: cincinnati, ohio
Default

One thing I thought about when I bought my 29 were things like routine maintenance. I can get right down next to my engine on both sides and work on it. Also oil changes and the like are easier. A single 29 is defenitly not the fastest boat on the water though!
still smoking is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-2011 | 10:53 AM
  #8  
trc2's Avatar
scarab
15 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Easton Maryland
Default

My 29 stock will run 67 to 68 mph you will not see 70 in a stock twin 29 scarab
trc2 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-2011 | 10:30 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Clear Water Beach Florida
Default

I have been the twin route, I prefer a big single. The reason is fuel, maintance, and weight. I have a 29 Fountain 540 700HP and a 27 Baja Boss 509 m3 Procharged 730 hp. I embarrass Large twin engine boats all the time. I have friends here in florida that have 100k boats that struggle to keep up. when these guys gas up its around 1200 for the weekend. I spend around 400.00 Most of the guys only run wot 75-85 mph.
pacalim1965@yaho is offline  
Reply
Old 04-06-2011 | 09:11 PM
  #10  
hullofjustis's Avatar
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 11
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

I had a single engine blown 540 putting out 820hp with a 1 inch imco shorty and it ran 85mph and it was very fuel efficient for what it was.
hullofjustis is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.