Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Stock exhaust vs stainless marine exhaust >

Stock exhaust vs stainless marine exhaust

Notices

Stock exhaust vs stainless marine exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-06-2011 | 11:09 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 897
Likes: 10
From: Daniels, WV
Default Stock exhaust vs stainless marine exhaust

Was wondering what kind of gains I can expect from my SBC by switching to stainless marine from stock merc exhaust. Its 350cid, lt4 hot cam, vortec heads, 9.8:1 or so compression, 650 demon carb. It's turning about 5200 rpm and getting me to about 63 mph with a 21p laser II prop. The boat is 1987 concord magnum II 20 ft.
87MagnumII is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-2011 | 05:48 PM
  #2  
Ted G's Avatar
Charter Member
20 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,663
Likes: 2
From: Edgerock Baby!!
Default

You will see some minor gains because they do flow better than stock exhaust. But the main benefit is longevity, some SM setups out there are 20 years old and still working fine. Even in fresh water stock manifolds are pretty much toast at 7 years.
__________________
Chesapeake Bay Powerboat Association
www.cbpba.com
Ted G is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-2011 | 06:26 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: ct/fl
Default

i bought a pair of ones from revolution marine for my vortec small block, great price everthing is included, check them out 1st
innerrage is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-2011 | 07:42 PM
  #4  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Default Low Cost Option

Originally Posted by 87MagnumII
Was wondering what kind of gains I can expect from my SBC by switching to stainless marine from stock merc exhaust. Its 350cid, lt4 hot cam, vortec heads, 9.8:1 or so compression, 650 demon carb. It's turning about 5200 rpm and getting me to about 63 mph with a 21p laser II prop. The boat is 1987 concord magnum II 20 ft.
You may want to check out GLM which offers aluminum cast manifolds and risers for a much lower price.

Any gains would be be around 1 to 1.5 mph which is not bad for a bolt on and this would be partly from the weight savings from cast iron to alum. The GLMs are semi tuned (individual runners running close but not completely to the riser. As you can see in the stock Merc manifold, it is just a large cavern no runners at all.
TEXASRPM is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-2011 | 07:46 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
From: Boca/Brentwood
Default

Good product better&lighter than stock exaust!
PARADISE ISLAND is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-2011 | 12:13 AM
  #6  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Lake Winnebago, MO, 43MM LOTO
Default

I put them on a stock 6.2 a few years back saw about 100-80 rpm increase and dropped exactly 83lbs from the stock iron gained maybe 1 1/2-2 mph but I owe this to the weight savings in addition to the slight increase in RPM's. By dropping weight in the stern my boat handled better, always good to take the fatman out of the back seat lol. As info mine is a 18 Donzi, still have them after 5 seasons and they look as new! Great product IMO Steve
osur866 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-2011 | 11:23 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
Default

From what I understand, the stock Merc 496 manifolds are aluminum with individual internal runners similar to the aftermarket units. They also use the dry joint with the jumper hose, and the riser makes a more gradual bend than the older risers. If you look around, these come up for sale used occasionally in the $500 range. They share the same flange pattern as the older Mk IV/ Gen V/VI big blocks. It might be a good upgrade for the money.
Budman II is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-2011 | 12:08 PM
  #8  
Knot 4 Me's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 797
From: Central IL
Default

Originally Posted by Budman II
From what I understand, the stock Merc 496 manifolds are aluminum with individual internal runners similar to the aftermarket units. They also use the dry joint with the jumper hose, and the riser makes a more gradual bend than the older risers. If you look around, these come up for sale used occasionally in the $500 range. They share the same flange pattern as the older Mk IV/ Gen V/VI big blocks. It might be a good upgrade for the money.
Earlier ones were aluminum. Later cast iron. All had stainless risers.
Knot 4 Me is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-2011 | 01:19 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 897
Likes: 10
From: Daniels, WV
Default

Does anybody have any experience with imco or edddie marine on a small block? All of these companies claim big gains but most of them come with a big price and the emi thunder and imco power flow seem to be a little cheaper than stainless marine
87MagnumII is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-2011 | 01:39 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Lake Texoma, OK
Default

I replace my stock (502) manafolds and risers with SM last year. Don't know about HP increase but I can tell it breaths better and it sounds beachen and the weight loss helped too! Do it!
Thunderstruck27 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.