Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Sterling 1700-Powered Skater Back on The Water This Week >

Sterling 1700-Powered Skater Back on The Water This Week

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Sterling 1700-Powered Skater Back on The Water This Week

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-13-2011 | 10:37 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Correspondent
Community Builder
15 Year Member
Platinum Member
Correspondent
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11,593
Likes: 4,191
Default Sterling 1700-Powered Skater Back on The Water This Week

Still following this story, http://speedonthewater.com/in-the-ne...this-week.html.
Matt Trulio is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2011 | 12:09 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 11
From: San Diego, California
Wink

Always seems amazing what big horsepower and torque can do to props and shafts. I think that this was about the same horsepower level in the engines that Reggie used back a few years ago for his then v-bottom record runs. I know these are different engine animals but the horsepower is about the same. Should be interesting to see how fast that Skater will run, my guess ,185-190.
Hopefully all will go well from here on, as it seems like Sterling and others have put a lot of investment and work into this project. Best of Luck to them and "Keep it on the Rails!"

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2011 | 10:40 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Correspondent
Community Builder
15 Year Member
Platinum Member
Correspondent
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11,593
Likes: 4,191
Default

Originally Posted by Raylar
Always seems amazing what big horsepower and torque can do to props and shafts. I think that this was about the same horsepower level in the engines that Reggie used back a few years ago for his then v-bottom record runs. I know these are different engine animals but the horsepower is about the same. Should be interesting to see how fast that Skater will run, my guess ,185-190.
Hopefully all will go well from here on, as it seems like Sterling and others have put a lot of investment and work into this project. Best of Luck to them and "Keep it on the Rails!"

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Yeah, that is quite a bit of horsepower and peak torque to manage with a No. 6 drive.
Matt Trulio is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2011 | 10:57 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Gurnee IL
Default

Originally Posted by Raylar
Always seems amazing what big horsepower and torque can do to props and shafts. I think that this was about the same horsepower level in the engines that Reggie used back a few years ago for his then v-bottom record runs. I know these are different engine animals but the horsepower is about the same. Should be interesting to see how fast that Skater will run, my guess ,185-190. Hopefully all will go well from here on, as it seems like Sterling and others have put a lot of investment and work into this project. Best of Luck to them and "Keep it on the Rails!"

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
my guess ,185-190.
may want to guess again
fountainfan42 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2011 | 11:16 AM
  #5  
Gold Member
15 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,748
Likes: 868
From: Delray Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Trulio
Yeah, that is quite a bit of horsepower and peak torque to manage with a No. 6 drive.
Just curious, wy did they choose the No.6 and not the M8?
Keith Atlanta is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2011 | 11:26 AM
  #6  
cdowns's Avatar
Commercial Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Keith Atlanta
Just curious, wy did they choose the No.6 and not the M8?
You cant buy an M8 wuthout buying a Merc 1350.

Last edited by cdowns; 09-14-2011 at 12:21 PM.
cdowns is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2011 | 11:56 AM
  #7  
Gold Member
15 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,748
Likes: 868
From: Delray Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by cdowns
You cant buy an M8 wuthout buyimg a Merc 1350.
That answers that question...

Kinda throws a wrench in the project!
Keith Atlanta is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2011 | 12:48 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 1
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

And the boat already had 6's on it.
jmeng is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2011 | 12:52 PM
  #9  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 463
Likes: 13
Default

Why not just put Arneson's on the back? Wouldn't they handle the power and torque better?
chewiekw is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2011 | 02:07 PM
  #10  
GLH's Avatar
GLH
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,270
Likes: 21
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Trulio
...a new set of forged propellers was not readily available.
I don't think those 44" pitched props are on the shelf...
GLH is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.