Dana marine exhaust vs cmi headers
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: QLD
Is their a big difference in performance between Dana marines exhaust manifolds and cmi,s full tubular headers?
How many run the Dana setup? I really like the look of them and the price seems very cheap compared to cmi,s. can only assume Dana,s make less hp but do they not leak?
How many run the Dana setup? I really like the look of them and the price seems very cheap compared to cmi,s. can only assume Dana,s make less hp but do they not leak?
#2
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 11
From: San Diego, California
Raylar and Bob at Full Throttle tested both systems fairly well and there are threads here on OSO giving that information in great detail. JMO, but I feel in fiarly mild 400HP to 700HP normally aspirated marine engines the differences in power are very negligable and the real determiners will be overall cost and reliability. dont forget to consider the Keith Eickert 755's cast header as a candidate!
Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
#3
Raylar and Bob at Full Throttle tested both systems fairly well and there are threads here on OSO giving that information in great detail. JMO, but I feel in fiarly mild 400HP to 700HP normally aspirated marine engines the differences in power are very negligable and the real determiners will be overall cost and reliability. dont forget to consider the Keith Eickert 755's cast header as a candidate!
Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
__________________
Throttles- Cleveland Construction 377 Talon
08 OPA Class 1 National Champion
08 Class 1 Geico Triple Crown Champion
08 OPA High Points Champion
10 OPA Class 1 National Champion ( happy now Ed! )
Throttles- Cleveland Construction 377 Talon
08 OPA Class 1 National Champion
08 Class 1 Geico Triple Crown Champion
08 OPA High Points Champion
10 OPA Class 1 National Champion ( happy now Ed! )
#4
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 11
From: San Diego, California
I don't think the gains would be even measurable and the cost of extrude hone is pretty pricey for that part I would suspect.
Again, I guess it's a "IF It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It" kinda answer.
Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Again, I guess it's a "IF It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It" kinda answer.
Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
#5
Board Member ( Check300 ) has 3 years on his now.
572" tall Deck twin turbo 1,500 HP
Zero Problems
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...eckmate-4.html
Post 33
Jon
572" tall Deck twin turbo 1,500 HP
Zero Problems

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...eckmate-4.html
Post 33
Jon
__________________
Last edited by cougarman; 01-12-2012 at 02:29 PM.
#8
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: QLD
Have always been very impressed with Dana marine's stuff.
With all the problems people are having with cmi headers leaking and if it's true the differences in performance are minimal up to 700hp why don't more people swap to them? Especially considering they are a fraction of the price.
Has anyone chucked a set on a 525 merc as a replacement that can vouch for power gain/loss?
Just seems as though every new power build has cmi's or similar these days so I guess my general assumption was they must be that much better that they are worth the leaking risk?
With all the problems people are having with cmi headers leaking and if it's true the differences in performance are minimal up to 700hp why don't more people swap to them? Especially considering they are a fraction of the price.
Has anyone chucked a set on a 525 merc as a replacement that can vouch for power gain/loss?
Just seems as though every new power build has cmi's or similar these days so I guess my general assumption was they must be that much better that they are worth the leaking risk?
#9
Have always been very impressed with Dana marine's stuff.
With all the problems people are having with cmi headers leaking and if it's true the differences in performance are minimal up to 700hp why don't more people swap to them? Especially considering they are a fraction of the price.
Has anyone chucked a set on a 525 merc as a replacement that can vouch for power gain/loss?
Just seems as though every new power build has cmi's or similar these days so I guess my general assumption was they must be that much better that they are worth the leaking risk?
With all the problems people are having with cmi headers leaking and if it's true the differences in performance are minimal up to 700hp why don't more people swap to them? Especially considering they are a fraction of the price.
Has anyone chucked a set on a 525 merc as a replacement that can vouch for power gain/loss?
Just seems as though every new power build has cmi's or similar these days so I guess my general assumption was they must be that much better that they are worth the leaking risk?
#10
I think people just like the bling
and are willing to take the Ding X2
Initially to build the headers
Second ding to the wallet is when they leak and hurt parts.
I think Dana builds the nicest cast manifold from and engineering and cosmetic stand point.
They designed the header look into there product and it's much easier on the eyes.
Jon
and are willing to take the Ding X2
Initially to build the headers
Second ding to the wallet is when they leak and hurt parts.
I think Dana builds the nicest cast manifold from and engineering and cosmetic stand point.
They designed the header look into there product and it's much easier on the eyes.

Jon
__________________



