575sci 502 to 540
#1
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 14
From: MI
What is the best way to get to the 540 displacement? I dont think my cylinders have any ridge so should I use a stroker crank, go with shorter rods and use my pistons? Or should I keep the rods and go with different pin height pistons? The pistons are JE and the rods are Hbeam Manley (what merc used stock in the 575). Not up on BBC internals like I used to be on SBCs.
Last edited by JRider; 12-06-2012 at 09:29 AM.
#2
Im going from 502' to 540's, the route Im taking is to reuse my gen 6 blocks, bore them around .030 to 4.500, 6.385 H beam rods and 4.25 stroker cranks, pistons will be 4cc to 10cc dome and should put me around 9.5 9.8 compression with a 118 cc chamber. AFR 305 as cast with CNC'd chambers is what Im going to run.
good luck
good luck
#4
Registered
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB. Canada
Im going from 502' to 540's, the route Im taking is to reuse my gen 6 blocks, bore them around .030 to 4.500, 6.385 H beam rods and 4.25 stroker cranks, pistons will be 4cc to 10cc dome and should put me around 9.5 9.8 compression with a 118 cc chamber. AFR 305 as cast with CNC'd chambers is what Im going to run.
good luck
good luck
#5
What is the best way to get to the 540 displacement? I dont think my cylinders have any ridge so should I use a stroker crank, go with shorter rods and use my pistons? Or should I keep the rods and go with different pin height pistons? The pistons are JE and the rods are Hbeam Manley (what merc used stock in the 575). Not up on BBC internals like I used to be on SBCs.
#6
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 14
From: MI
Not looking to hit that exact displacement. Going for bang for buck i guess you could say. I am limited on how big I can go due to the dual throttle body setup.
#7
Is there a way to do it and keep you pistons? You would need to change your crank and rods but wouldn't you have to change pin height on the piston or can this be made up by a different rod length? I am also curious
#8
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,480
Likes: 43
From: Tennessee
Depending on how the pistons and crank counterweight are cut, they may or may not clear the crank counterweights with a stock (6.135) length rod. Usually, they won't clear, so you need to go to a 6.385 or 6.535 rod with a 4.25" crank. You would also have a less than desirable rod angle(1.44) with a 6.135 rod and 4.25 crank. If you use the longer rod, then you will have to change the pistons because the compression height will not be correct. Most would use a 6.385 rod with the 4.25" crank.
Eddie
Eddie
#9
Registered
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 518
Likes: 3
From: On a Boat
Im going from 502' to 540's, the route Im taking is to reuse my gen 6 blocks, bore them around .030 to 4.500, 6.385 H beam rods and 4.25 stroker cranks, pistons will be 4cc to 10cc dome and should put me around 9.5 9.8 compression with a 118 cc chamber. AFR 305 as cast with CNC'd chambers is what Im going to run.
good luck
good luck
#10
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: RI
Im going from 502' to 540's, the route Im taking is to reuse my gen 6 blocks, bore them around .030 to 4.500, 6.385 H beam rods and 4.25 stroker cranks, pistons will be 4cc to 10cc dome and should put me around 9.5 9.8 compression with a 118 cc chamber. AFR 305 as cast with CNC'd chambers is what Im going to run.
good luck
good luck
Dead on and sounds like a Bob M build up. He did the 548 tall deck I got and cant wait for spring to get it in the boat and on the water






