Notices
General Boating Discussion

Power/ weight ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-17-2014 | 08:05 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 789
Likes: 2
From: Long Island n.y.
Default Power/ weight ratio?

Don't know if there are any physicist out there but I have a mathematical question I need to try to answer before any testing. Excuse it's feaken cold out and I can't . So here is the question
If I'm cruising at 3500rpms at full fuel tanks getting 11/2-2 miles per gal at 9000lbs . What will I be burning with another 1500lbs of extra fuel. I do understand that I don't have any other variables at this moment ( it's freaken cold out) but does anyone have any clue as to what this weight load would do to mpg?
Drew555 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2014 | 02:36 PM
  #2  
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Are you planning to keep the throttle position in the same position and let the speed vary or hold at 3500 RPM regardless of weight?
BenPerfected is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2014 | 03:48 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,900
Likes: 10
From: Vice City & Tavernier, FL
Default

Depending on whether all other aerodynamic and hydrodynamic variables remaining the same, and assuming a constant rpm of 3,500, at what point to you want to make the calculation as to fuel consumption? The number will be in constant change because the weight of the boat will decrease as you burn fuel.
thedonz is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2014 | 03:51 PM
  #4  
Gold Member
15 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,748
Likes: 869
From: Delray Beach, FL
Default

Is it a Saturday or a Weekday?

What time did you leave the marina?
Keith Atlanta is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2014 | 04:23 PM
  #5  
glassdave's Avatar
Neno the mind boggler
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,080
Likes: 320
From: toledo oh
Default

without less fuel you'll get closer to two mpg . . . . . with the more fuel you will get closer to 1 1/2



Originally Posted by Drew555
Don't know if there are any physicist out there but I have a mathematical question I need to try to answer before any testing. Excuse it's feaken cold out and I can't . So here is the question
If I'm cruising at 3500rpms at full fuel tanks getting 11/2-2 miles per gal at 9000lbs . What will I be burning with another 1500lbs of extra fuel. I do understand that I don't have any other variables at this moment ( it's freaken cold out) but does anyone have any clue as to what this weight load would do to mpg?

course now that i re read it it looks like a trick question . . . . if you cruising at 3500 with full fuel tanks where are you going to put the extra 1500 lbs of fuel . . . . thats almost two hundred gallons
__________________
Throttles- Cleveland Construction 377 Talon
08 OPA Class 1 National Champion
08 Class 1 Geico Triple Crown Champion
08 OPA High Points Champion
10 OPA Class 1 National Champion ( happy now Ed! )

Last edited by glassdave; 12-18-2014 at 04:31 PM.
glassdave is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2014 | 04:32 PM
  #6  
GPM
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 93
From: Pa
Default

2 empty tanks being towed back to the dock will yield your best fuel economy.
GPM is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2014 | 04:41 PM
  #7  
Velocity Vector's Avatar
Crazy Energy
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma God's country no one else wants it.
Default

That's an easy one.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]534571[/ATTACH]
Attached Thumbnails Power/ weight ratio?-1864.jpg  
Velocity Vector is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2014 | 04:57 PM
  #8  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,097
Likes: 3,686
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

I have a super computer at work. I plugged in your word problem, and right before the computer caught on fire, I smelled what I can only describe as marijuana. It seems as though the computer knew it was stressing and figured the best way to relax was to fire up a joint.

Wow.

1.108973 to 1.220089 mpg was the answer before it imploded.
SB is online now  
Reply
Old 12-18-2014 | 05:10 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 789
Likes: 2
From: Long Island n.y.
Default

Originally Posted by glassdave
without less fuel you'll get closer to two mpg . . . . . with the more fuel you will get closer to 1 1/2






course now that i re read it it looks like a trick question . . . . if you cruising at 3500 with full fuel tanks where are you going to put the extra 1500 lbs of fuel . . . . thats almost two hundred gallons
Atl fuel bags
Drew555 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2014 | 05:14 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 789
Likes: 2
From: Long Island n.y.
Default

Let's try this. What about speed loss due to weight ? Let's say you have two really fat chicks in the boat weighing in at 1500 lbs. what kind of mph could be due to 2) hogs. I'm trying to calculate how to get 300 miles without stopping for fuel. Maybe this is easier to calculate with fat chicks... Don't know
Drew555 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.