Has anyone run the 1st design SCX-4 lower and switched to the 2nd design SCX-4 lower
#3
Here are some pics from Imco's web site.. I am also interested in hearing about the differences between these two lowers..
[ATTACH=CONFIG]535706[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]535705[/ATTACH]
Second design is on the left.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]535706[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]535705[/ATTACH]
Second design is on the left.
#4
Registered
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
From: Gaylord, Mi
I have the new design where the skeg goes almost to the tip of the nose cone. I was told that they redesigned it this way to help break the water and ehlp settle the stern of the boat. I never had the other design but I can say I dont have trouble with stern lift. SHould also be noted that I have normal scx but thought I would comment since we are talking about lowers.
#5
Registered
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 774
Likes: 1
From: Wild n Reckless From North Texas
Thanks for posting pics, curious on feedback from new design
#7
Registered
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 310
Likes: 3
From: Long Island
I have run both and running the new style,it gave my boat a little more control and handling.Also it still has the low water pick up on the bullet,drive has built in cooler that runs through this pick up.[ATTACH=CONFIG]535819[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]535820[/ATTACH] Also on my single engine application I needed to add a torque tab to prevent blow out at high speed,very happy with it.
Last edited by pro27; 01-18-2015 at 07:36 AM.
#8
Registered
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: Gunnison Co
You are saying it doesn't have a slit in the nose cone.
But you are also saying you have to open up the small hole that's there?




