Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Mph lost goin to b max drive from xr drive >

Mph lost goin to b max drive from xr drive

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Mph lost goin to b max drive from xr drive

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-03-2015 | 10:53 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Default Mph lost goin to b max drive from xr drive

Right now I have xr drives with 2 inch imco shorties and my 42 fountain is running mid to low 90s. I'm swapping over to b max uppers with imco 2 inch shorties. How much mph if any will I loose swapping to bmax
slippy0217 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2015 | 10:57 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 3
From: indianapolis
Default

I would think none. It's the same gear set.
indysupra is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2015 | 11:23 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Default

Xr 1.5 bmax 1.36 but goin to smaller props due to gear ratio change
slippy0217 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2015 | 12:51 PM
  #4  
bor's Avatar
bor
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 728
Likes: 4
From: uithoorn,the netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by indysupra
I would think none. It's the same gear set.
upper gear is much bigger 5" if I m correct so the b max will eat more hp then the xr and the ratio change could also hurth a little bit .but its much better not to worry to blow a drive !
bor is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2015 | 03:06 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 13
From: Hamilton, Ohio
Default

2-4mph from what I hear....
jmoore1225 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2015 | 03:15 PM
  #6  
glassdave's Avatar
Neno the mind boggler
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,080
Likes: 320
From: toledo oh
Default

Originally Posted by slippy0217
Xr 1.5 bmax 1.36 but goin to smaller props due to gear ratio change
it may just be a lateral move. Going to the smaller prop on a taller ratio is going to benefit from having a more efficient prop in the water. What you lose in parasitic loss you may gain back in less prop slip. (I have nothing to back any of this up . . . . just trying to be an optimistic fellow boater lol)
__________________
Throttles- Cleveland Construction 377 Talon
08 OPA Class 1 National Champion
08 Class 1 Geico Triple Crown Champion
08 OPA High Points Champion
10 OPA Class 1 National Champion ( happy now Ed! )
glassdave is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2015 | 03:45 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 239
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by glassdave
it may just be a lateral move. Going to the smaller prop on a taller ratio is going to benefit from having a more efficient prop in the water. What you lose in parasitic loss you may gain back in less prop slip. (I have nothing to back any of this up . . . . just trying to be an optimistic fellow boater lol)
I agree with that theory, Slippy what pitch prop were you running with the 1.50 ratio?
abones is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2015 | 03:54 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 13
From: Hamilton, Ohio
Default

slippy what year Fountain?
jmoore1225 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2015 | 06:40 PM
  #9  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,232
Likes: 2,482
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

Going from a 1.5 to a 1.36 normally requires about 3" less pitch. I would go down 4" switching to the BMax.
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-2015 | 06:43 PM
  #10  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,611
Likes: 371
From: Traverse City MI
Default

Really doesn't matter the strength increase is worth the money!
offshorexcursion is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.