Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Roller rocker debate >

Roller rocker debate

Notices

Roller rocker debate

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-04-2017 | 07:17 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 493
Likes: 17
From: San Tan Valley AZ
Default Roller rocker debate

I am finishing up my 489s. Cam is .547 .547 112lsa 230/236 with eq 320 heads. My debate is what rockers to go with. I am looking at comp pro magnums, harland diamonds, and scorpion marine. Also up in the air on 1.7 vs 1.8 or even a combo of both. Whats your take??
mggdoors is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-2017 | 07:43 PM
  #2  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,895
Likes: 123
From: Chicago, IL; Onekama, MI
Default

Go with the Comp Ultra Pro Magnum Rockers. They are better than aluminum rockers for the following reasons- Better fatigue resistance, rebuildable, lighter over the nose, less bulky, and I'm sure a few other good reasons. Also the price will be on par with the better aluminum rockers.

On my old engines I broke a Crane Gold and I didn't have that many hours on the rockers. My new engines have the Comp Stainless Steel rockers, which are no longer available. Either way after my experience with Golds and what I've discussed with a few guys, I'll never run aluminum rockers again!
endeavour32 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-2017 | 08:01 PM
  #3  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

I have very little expertise on the matter, but after some research I went with the Comp Cams Ultra Pro Magnums. I'm just more comfortable with steel as all.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-2017 | 08:04 PM
  #4  
vintage chromoly's Avatar
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 18
From: cleveland ohio
Default



This is like asking if fords or Chevys are better.

Whatever you decide, make sure the setup / geometry works out correctly. I'd bet that lots of valvetrain failures are due to poor setup as apposed to aluminum vs. Steel or brand vs. Brand.
vintage chromoly is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-2017 | 08:19 PM
  #5  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by endeavour32
Go with the Comp Ultra Pro Magnum Rockers. They are better than aluminum rockers for the following reasons- Better fatigue resistance, rebuildable, lighter over the nose, less bulky, and I'm sure a few other good reasons. Also the price will be on par with the better aluminum rockers.

On my old engines I broke a Crane Gold and I didn't have that many hours on the rockers. My new engines have the Comp Stainless Steel rockers, which are no longer available. Either way after my experience with Golds and what I've discussed with a few guys, I'll never run aluminum rockers again!
For some reason I think I remember that day. Never gave it much thought though. I've ran cranes golds for over 30 plus years and never had a problem but that's certainly not to say there's much better out there now. I've just never had an issue with them in fact just bought a new set of 1.8's for dyno testing only. I've looked at the ultra pro mags for new builds and seem pretty nice.

What ever OP does just stay away from the import 125.00 set of rockers. I wouldn't recommend those to anyone. Amazing how many of those big hp engines you see on the net selling cheap use all those components though. Buyer looks at price and power. Not cool. OP your cam is on the small side but should help save your drive among other things. You propping for 5200-5400.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-2017 | 08:21 PM
  #6  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by vintage chromoly


This is like asking if fords or Chevys are better.

Whatever you decide, make sure the setup / geometry works out correctly. I'd bet that lots of valvetrain failures are due to poor setup as apposed to aluminum vs. Steel or brand vs. Brand.
I read an article from a reputable builder the other day and they said 80-90 % of engine failures stem from poor valvetrain geometry and stability.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-2017 | 08:27 PM
  #7  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

Originally Posted by mggdoors
I am finishing up my 489s. Cam is .547 .547 112lsa 230/236 with eq 320 heads. My debate is what rockers to go with. I am looking at comp pro magnums, harland diamonds, and scorpion marine. Also up in the air on 1.7 vs 1.8 or even a combo of both. Whats your take??
of the three the comp pro magnum is the best imo.edit in,for your application any of the three will work ,also i wolud go 1.7 ratio.

Last edited by mike tkach; 01-04-2017 at 09:00 PM.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-2017 | 08:51 PM
  #8  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by endeavour32
Go with the Comp Ultra Pro Magnum Rockers. They are better than aluminum rockers for the following reasons- Better fatigue resistance, rebuildable, lighter over the nose, less bulky, and I'm sure a few other good reasons. Also the price will be on par with the better aluminum rockers.

On my old engines I broke a Crane Gold and I didn't have that many hours on the rockers. My new engines have the Comp Stainless Steel rockers, which are no longer available. Either way after my experience with Golds and what I've discussed with a few guys, I'll never run aluminum rockers again!
Part number #1826. I see they come in 1.6's also. Hmmm. Might be worth buying a set and installing on your intakes while your out of town.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-2017 | 09:02 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 493
Likes: 17
From: San Tan Valley AZ
Default

I was thinking comp ultras myself for reliability standpoint. I hear 1.8 causes more sideloading. Should i stay away from those or chase the power
mggdoors is offline  
Reply
Old 01-04-2017 | 09:28 PM
  #10  
14 apache's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 15
From: Northport N.Y.
Default

Originally Posted by mggdoors
I was thinking comp ultras myself for reliability standpoint. I hear 1.8 causes more sideloading. Should i stay away from those or chase the power
If you want 1 mph go for it but the extra load on the lifters won't be worth it.
14 apache is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.