Notices

280 build

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-26-2017 | 07:40 PM
  #1  
BUP
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 45
From: Ft. Worth TX
Default 280 build

What year did the 280 completely get away from wood in its construction or maybe what HIN number did that all start with.

Also what is the most current year OEM Velocity 280 built ?

2008 ?? or am I way off ?
BUP is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-2017 | 04:27 PM
  #2  
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 638
From: Lakewood, NY, USA
Default

Not sure when but my 2005 VR 1 has no wood, including transom. I assume the 280 and 290
Have the same construction. If anyone knows it will be Kenny.

Padraig
Padraig is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-2017 | 04:50 PM
  #3  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 1
From: MD
Default

I think all 280's and 290 SC are made with wood; plywood stringers, bulkheads and transom. Earlier 280's also had a balsa deck. The 290SC and later 280's have foam-core decks with vinylester resin and balsa cored hull unless the complete boats were specially ordered with coosa and vinylester resins. The VR1's were constructed with coosa composites and vinylester resins and vacuumed bagged standard.
modvp is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-2017 | 07:02 PM
  #4  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 153
From: Tygart Lake, WV
Default

Originally Posted by modvp
I think all 280's and 290 SC are made with wood; plywood stringers, bulkheads and transom. Earlier 280's also had a balsa deck. The 290SC and later 280's have foam-core decks with vinylester resin and balsa cored hull unless the complete boats were specially ordered with coosa and vinylester resins. The VR1's were constructed with coosa composites and vinylester resins and vacuumed bagged standard.
I'll echo that.... no wood in my VR1 other than mine!!��
Ryan00TJ is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-2017 | 07:32 PM
  #5  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 1
From: MD
Default

I wish the 290SC's were all built like the VR1's.
modvp is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-2017 | 08:53 PM
  #6  
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 638
From: Lakewood, NY, USA
Default

Originally Posted by modvp
I wish the 290SC's were all built like the VR1's.
HAve you had Problems?

Padraig
Padraig is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-2017 | 10:56 PM
  #7  
BUP
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 45
From: Ft. Worth TX
Default

So how are the 290 SC's built then ?
BUP is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-2017 | 07:51 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Stroudsburg, pa
Default

So totally cool, never knew the vr1's were wood free. With this set up what does say a vr1 weight ? I've been hunting around and cant find an honest #.
Bajajay98 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-2017 | 08:10 PM
  #9  
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 638
From: Lakewood, NY, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Bajajay98
So totally cool, never knew the vr1's were wood free. With this set up what does say a vr1 weight ? I've been hunting around and cant find an honest #.
According to the specs on the Velocity Website the VR 1 with a 496 weighs 4300# vs 4650 for the 290sc.
Padraig is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-2017 | 06:08 AM
  #10  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 1
From: MD
Default

No problems at all; I like the extra deck height and of the 290Sc and the enclosed head but would have preferred it to be constructed with coosa.
modvp is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.