Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Gimble ring replacement access panel >

Gimble ring replacement access panel

Notices

Gimble ring replacement access panel

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-12-2021 | 10:06 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 225
From: Ohio
Default Gimble ring replacement access panel

Has anyone seen or heard of any strength issues with the bravo outer transom plates when the access panel is cut out of the back instead of using the mercury holes drilled through the sides?

I haven’t heard of any myself but only personally know them on boats under 70mph. Just something I’ve been curious about for a few years.
tmmii is offline  
Reply
Old 12-12-2021 | 11:54 PM
  #2  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 164
Likes: 150
From: LI,NY
Default

If you're referring to the JR marine kit. I did that on the Outlaw I had, though it was a sub 70 mph boat I never had any issues while it was on the boat. When I pulled the motor I replaced the whole transom assembly since I had access to it
anger mgmt is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-2021 | 08:04 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 765
Likes: 291
From: USA, PA
Default

I have those on both my drives, no issues so far after 3 years. My boat tops at 67, so sorry it's also under 70.
SabrToothSqrl is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-2021 | 11:45 AM
  #4  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,230
Likes: 536
Default

Had the jr mod on my 70mph boat for 7-8 years-250hrs. No issues at all. I wouldn't hesitate on installing it.
underpsi68 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-15-2021 | 10:40 AM
  #5  
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 583
Likes: 363
From: Portland OR
Default

I'm running one on an 80mph single Bravo.
87MirageIntruder is offline  
Reply
Old 12-15-2021 | 10:31 PM
  #6  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 891
Default

Not sure I would translate load on bravo vs. top speed.

faster boats have less drag, lighter weight, and sometimes more power.

i.e. a top gun with twin steps that runs 85 is likely putting less load on drive of a old flat bottom that is only running 70mph.

the are that is modified to do the kit is not a high stress area. I say go for it.
1MOSES1 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-16-2021 | 11:23 AM
  #7  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 265
Likes: 16
From: Omaha, NE
Default

I ran it on a 27 big block Crownline for 9yrs and no issues and rebuilt them using the same kit on my current PowerQuest 380 back in 2013. Only issue I had with the Powerquest was CP Performance drive shower hits bottom cap screws if drives are turned all the way and trimmed up all the way. It damaged cap screws and threads, so i put in heli-coils and went with button head socket screws and did some grinding on drive showers where they touched for additional clearance.
Cory H is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2021 | 11:40 AM
  #8  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 39
From: Further South East of Dome Island
Default

Change the entire TA instead.
Pismo10 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2021 | 12:23 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 765
Likes: 291
From: USA, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Pismo10
Change the entire TA instead.
I think that's yes the best option, but not having to pull the engines is a plus I did mine and am happy w/the results.
SabrToothSqrl is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2021 | 02:13 PM
  #10  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 299
Likes: 83
From: Naples , Fl
Default

Hydraulic steering ….
smokediver is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.