Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Cam recommendations 572 blower >

Cam recommendations 572 blower

Notices

Cam recommendations 572 blower

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-13-2024 | 10:31 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 8
Likes: 4
From: Treasure Island, FL
Default Cam recommendations 572 blower

Looking to cam up a 572 dart, hyd. roller, 345 heads Merlin, valves 2.3 I / 1.88 E, procharged 6-12psi, 1400 Dominator, 6500 redlined, 26' 4000 lb. American Offshore catamaran. Guessing around 112, 264 dur, 680-720 lift. Those are just some random suggested specs. IDK. TIA Anyone got a similar setup and love how your cam rolls, let me know what you love and why.

Last edited by AsaltWeapon; 03-13-2024 at 10:33 AM.
AsaltWeapon is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2024 | 11:27 AM
  #2  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Are the 345’s cnc’d or ported? I wouldn’t go to crazy on lift. Duration seems in the ball park. Ck out the comp lobes icdedpple had or has in his 548 builds if you get a chance. If you can’t find the thread via search let me know or he’ll likely chime in.

If you’re heads are stock I think their gonna be a choking point. JMO


Just for comparison only but still a good read!! Try and copy and paste. Cam below was one Dan jones spec’d however I don’t believe he went that route… can’t keep up with him! lol. I will say the cams he spec’d and ground for my na 565’s are spot on and very easy on the valvetrain and make awesome power all the way through!!!!

https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/374052-tunell-raaammm.html





Last edited by getrdunn; 03-13-2024 at 11:58 AM.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2024 | 01:08 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 8
Likes: 4
From: Treasure Island, FL
Default

Mild porting done on heads. Plus exhaust raised .0600
AsaltWeapon is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2024 | 10:35 PM
  #4  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 6,418
From: Chicago
Default

This is what I ended up with .
Comp cams marine grind. Easy on the valve train.

It pushed a mid 80s tank to triple digits.
8# of boost
Dart CNC pro 1 heads




26' and 4000lbs , thats is going to scream.!
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-2024 | 10:42 PM
  #5  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 6,418
From: Chicago
Default

Nice name btw,
My baja long ago ...






ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 03-14-2024 | 08:48 AM
  #6  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Came so close to buying one of those 26 AO’s for that same reason. Sucken gas and haulin azz! 😳
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 03-14-2024 | 02:12 PM
  #7  
GPM
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 93
From: Pa
Default

Originally Posted by AsaltWeapon
Looking to cam up a 572 dart, hyd. roller, 345 heads Merlin, valves 2.3 I / 1.88 E, procharged 6-12psi, 1400 Dominator, 6500 redlined, 26' 4000 lb. American Offshore catamaran. Guessing around 112, 264 dur, 680-720 lift. Those are just some random suggested specs. IDK. TIA Anyone got a similar setup and love how your cam rolls, let me know what you love and why.
Did you use a 4.5 or 4.375 crank ?
GPM is offline  
Reply
Old 03-14-2024 | 02:15 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 8
Likes: 4
From: Treasure Island, FL
Default

572 ci has 4.5/B x 4.5/S. Hope this helps. If I had 4.375/S, I wouldnt have a 572. Thanks
AsaltWeapon is offline  
Reply
Old 03-14-2024 | 03:23 PM
  #9  
GPM
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 93
From: Pa
Default

I believe the Chevrolet crate 572 is 4.560 x 4.375, that's why I asked. I think the 4.5 crank is better for a boat and I think it would like a little more cam than a shorter stroke, but it's only my opinion.
GPM is offline  
Reply
Old 03-14-2024 | 05:17 PM
  #10  
VIP Member
Community Builder
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,461
Likes: 2,089
From: SW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by GPM
I believe the Chevrolet crate 572 is 4.560 x 4.375, that's why I asked. I think the 4.5 crank is better for a boat and I think it would like a little more cam than a shorter stroke, but it's only my opinion.
GPM,

Though my readings here on OSO, I think the consensus is that a 4.375" stroke is better for a marine application due to rod angle and prolonged high RPM running. Many here advocate for nothing above a 565 for this very reason.

Thanks. Brad.
Brad Christy is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.