Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Hello,
I am contemplating putting a bravo x and 496 MAG HO into my boat. Need to know if the size is different. STBD side the starter is very close to a stringer, port side is pretty clear. Engine just clears the deck, and air filter just clears. Here are some pictures.






I am contemplating putting a bravo x and 496 MAG HO into my boat. Need to know if the size is different. STBD side the starter is very close to a stringer, port side is pretty clear. Engine just clears the deck, and air filter just clears. Here are some pictures.






#3
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
#4
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Tons of questions now.
Assuming that the HO delivers a bit more torque at ~3500-3600 cruise RPM would the fuel consumption be similar if not better? Maybe with the extra 50hp/more torque I can cruise at 3200-3400 instead?
I have a single engine setup, in a 30ft 11ft beam, 15 deg deadrise pilothouse (Penn Yan 305 Rampage). We tuna fish and it’s 11k boat with crew/ice/gear and I’m wondering if this may be a way to basically pick up 2 knots or so cruise speed and pretty much the same fuel consumption? Current numbers in good seas are 0.7mpg ish. Am I off here, educate me please…
Assuming that the HO delivers a bit more torque at ~3500-3600 cruise RPM would the fuel consumption be similar if not better? Maybe with the extra 50hp/more torque I can cruise at 3200-3400 instead?
I have a single engine setup, in a 30ft 11ft beam, 15 deg deadrise pilothouse (Penn Yan 305 Rampage). We tuna fish and it’s 11k boat with crew/ice/gear and I’m wondering if this may be a way to basically pick up 2 knots or so cruise speed and pretty much the same fuel consumption? Current numbers in good seas are 0.7mpg ish. Am I off here, educate me please…
#7
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0






