Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO >

Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO

Notices

Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-14-2024 | 08:03 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO

Hello,
I am contemplating putting a bravo x and 496 MAG HO into my boat. Need to know if the size is different. STBD side the starter is very close to a stringer, port side is pretty clear. Engine just clears the deck, and air filter just clears. Here are some pictures.






PENN YAN is offline  
Reply
Old 07-15-2024 | 02:00 AM
  #2  
bencini231's Avatar
Platinum Member
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 833
Likes: 639
From: Paducah,Ky
Default

Both are the same size
bencini231 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-15-2024 | 08:02 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bencini231
Both are the same size
thanks, any idea if the outdrive line up is very similar. I cannot shift the engine down at all for example. What about cut out for outdrive, will I need fiberglass work or is existing opening dimensions okay?
PENN YAN is offline  
Reply
Old 07-15-2024 | 08:16 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Tons of questions now.

Assuming that the HO delivers a bit more torque at ~3500-3600 cruise RPM would the fuel consumption be similar if not better? Maybe with the extra 50hp/more torque I can cruise at 3200-3400 instead?

I have a single engine setup, in a 30ft 11ft beam, 15 deg deadrise pilothouse (Penn Yan 305 Rampage). We tuna fish and it’s 11k boat with crew/ice/gear and I’m wondering if this may be a way to basically pick up 2 knots or so cruise speed and pretty much the same fuel consumption? Current numbers in good seas are 0.7mpg ish. Am I off here, educate me please…
PENN YAN is offline  
Reply
Old 07-15-2024 | 08:18 AM
  #5  
Sydwayz's Avatar
Forum Regulator
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
VIP Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24,203
Likes: 1,592
From: Worldwide
Default

The 496HO and the 496 Mag are externally IDENTICAL. Cam, programing, and a few different component changes over the years, are the only differences.
Sydwayz is offline  
Reply
Old 07-15-2024 | 12:38 PM
  #6  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,232
Likes: 2,482
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

Same engines with different cam and pcm. IMO, not worth the $$ unless you need to replace a failed engine or drive. You will probably loose cruise speed going a Bravo X on your boat
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-2024 | 07:42 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
Same engines with different cam and pcm. IMO, not worth the $$ unless you need to replace a failed engine or drive. You will probably loose cruise speed going a Bravo X on your boat
Why is that, the drive ratio?
PENN YAN is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-2024 | 10:14 PM
  #8  
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 333
From: ankeny,ia.
Default

Originally Posted by PENN YAN
Why is that, the drive ratio?
Are you going to put the B3 lower on it?….if not, that is why you’re going to loose speed in your application.
JaayTeee is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.