Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Big Block Chevy Intake decision >

Big Block Chevy Intake decision

Notices

Big Block Chevy Intake decision

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-08-2004 | 09:27 AM
  #1  
bryanspeedracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: rochester, ny
Default Big Block Chevy Intake decision

I am building two 468 motors for my 33 fountain. Comp. is a shade under 10:1. I am running a crane cch296 hyd/flat cam (.551/.573), GM990 rec port heads, Imco powerflo exh, and AED/Holley 850 carbs.

What intake should I be looking for/why? My head aches with all of the choices out there. Some say dual plane, others say single.

Thanks in advance- Bryan
bryanspeedracer is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-2004 | 10:01 AM
  #2  
dyno's Avatar
Charter Member #655
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,939
Likes: 1
From: Holland, Michigan
Default

what rpm range do you want to run in????Dual plane works good under 5300 single over ....my.02
__________________
If your boat has a sail do you ride a horse to the ramp?
dyno is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-2004 | 10:12 AM
  #3  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 396
Likes: 195
From: kansas city
Default

I have read some good things about the air gap manifold great torque
Bad to the bone is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-2004 | 10:27 AM
  #4  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 13
From: Argyle, TX
Default

I ran edelbrock victors on my 540's na's no trouble here.
JPD Motorsports is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-2004 | 11:29 AM
  #5  
Rookie's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,017
Likes: 1,519
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

I am also contemplating this decision. I have been running Weiand Stealths (dual plane) and happy with their performance, but my boats former life as a saltwaterboat destroyed them and need to be replaced.
Under the direction of JimV I am sticking with a dual plane for my 454's (468's). I am running 5200-5400rpm max. I am just curious about the RPM air gap, it appears it has the cut out plenum as the Stealth but also new technology of the air gap. also $10 cheaper. any extra info on head to head performance would be great.
Rookie is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-2004 | 11:32 AM
  #6  
dyno's Avatar
Charter Member #655
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,939
Likes: 1
From: Holland, Michigan
Default

Rookie DanB ran them on his warlock drop him a PM...hey your from my neck of the woods post a pic of your boat so I know who you are!!!
__________________
If your boat has a sail do you ride a horse to the ramp?
dyno is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-2004 | 11:38 AM
  #7  
blue thunder's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 6
From: IBX
Default

I would run dual planes due to the 850s. Dual planes can tolerate a little more carb than single plane. 850s are on the big side for 468s, but not too bad if used with dual plane.

BT
blue thunder is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-2004 | 11:39 AM
  #8  
cstraub69@comcast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You want the airgap. Your CID and the expected RPM range of a Bravo drive you don't need the runner volume of the single plane stuff. The air gap is a good choice between a dual plane. .. you get that low end torque from the runner design. . .and the single. . .since the runners are isolated from the valley pan area the intake charge is cooler and makes more power. I would run a 1" 4 hole spacer with this also.

Chris
Stef's Performance
 
Reply
Old 04-08-2004 | 11:51 AM
  #9  
TURB02256
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have run the Performer and Air Gap back to back and saw no differance in performance. One did hurt the wallet more and required modifications to the 40 dollar inlet hose. I then ran a Edelbrock Torqer which made a big differance eliminated bow rise and took it up to the limiter with out having to wait for the boat to "air out". I also ran both an 830 and a 750 on each combo there was little if any differance there.
I port heads for as side line for a friends shop and have flowed a few single and dual planes and ported a few my feeling now is dual planes suck and I will most likely never purchase another.
 
Reply
Old 04-08-2004 | 12:01 PM
  #10  
Rookie's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,017
Likes: 1,519
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

Turbo,
I don't believe the the Torquer is available in a rectangular manifold. I was told that you could use oval port mainfolds on rectangular heads, but not vice versa.
I have used the Torquer II on sbc 350's in boats with great luck. If I was to go with a single plane it would be my choice. HP/TQ isn't in 7000 rpm range like most.
Rookie is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.