28 + 3x 200XS?
#3
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Again, not something I am seriously considering but wanted to hear y'alls feedback. I figured the trip setup would be faster than a regular 2x300 setup as the 200XS motors are approx. 240hp. More reliable too?
#4
Registered

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,335
Likes: 857
The twin 300XS is now a proven platform for dependability, fuel efficient and has the speed w/o a lot of dial in as numerous people have already made their way through trial and errors.
Perfect example is Double Rigged's stunning 28, driver friendly and runs......seems more tweaks are made to the creature comforts of the boats than the rigging for the power.
twin 2.5 280's on the 28' had more top end but not as easy on the pocket book at the pumps+ upkeep
Perfect example is Double Rigged's stunning 28, driver friendly and runs......seems more tweaks are made to the creature comforts of the boats than the rigging for the power.
twin 2.5 280's on the 28' had more top end but not as easy on the pocket book at the pumps+ upkeep
#8
Registered

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 12
From: Pompano Beach, FL
I would like to see 3+300xs on a 30 skater. Better suited to hold the weight.
#9
Registered

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 359
Likes: 39
I would like to see 3+300xs on a 30 skater. Better suited to hold the weight.[/QUOTE]
I would like to see that as well, on a widened hull like the 338 without the bussel. To me the biggest advantage of triples is acceleration.
I would like to see that as well, on a widened hull like the 338 without the bussel. To me the biggest advantage of triples is acceleration.
#10
Registered

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 29
Just say No! I initially wanted to do two modified 300 X or three 300x on a new 30 Skater. Pete all but refused to do the triple engine citing plumbing for fuel and steering as well as tie bar and center pod for tunnel. Not to mention power to weight rational center of gravity and handling issues. Keep it simple.


