Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Superboat
y2k bottom evolution >

y2k bottom evolution

Notices

y2k bottom evolution

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-12-2013 | 03:27 PM
  #31  
Ted G's Avatar
Charter Member
20 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,663
Likes: 2
From: Edgerock Baby!!
Default

Originally Posted by Superbabi
Lighten up Ted, just playing with you !!! Although Superbabi was built for Big hp.
Must be why she has treated me so well, taking it easy on her in her golden years
__________________
Chesapeake Bay Powerboat Association
www.cbpba.com
Ted G is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 04:41 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 15
From: Cedar Point NC
Default

Originally Posted by Superbabi
2 years into the hull and your running her all wrong, must be all that Low Hp your your pushing thru her prop.
LOL ! Busted a laugh on that one ..
Ted the race layup boats are heavier not lighter and one thing that has been proven is that all the Y2k run different
OCCJoe is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 04:51 PM
  #33  
fantastixvoyage's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,219
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by OCCJoe
and one thing that has been proven is that all the Y2k run different
Any comparison in x-dimensions? Bet the propshaft heights have varied a bunch depending on the expected application. Willing to be superbabi is set high and hence not much reaction to trim.
fantastixvoyage is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 04:52 PM
  #34  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 15
From: Cedar Point NC
Default

Originally Posted by Ted G
A little over 75 GPS with a four blade prop and 500 hp and I'm running it wrong? How so? In full race trim the F1 boats only ran 77-79 when light? And I can cruise 60 at 3 MPG with the Maximus, not sure how you are gonna get much more out of it. BTW, I think the Maximus was part of your performance problems, when I had it prop scanned there was over an inch pitch variation between the blades, it runs much cleaner now that it was trued up to an even 26 on all 5 blades.
Ted just playing with you but a quote from May 2011..

Originally Posted by OCCJoe
That hull is going to be saying (what the hell have you done to me , 74 mph I used to do that at idol ) Lol
Don't worry bout the lights , just don't pull over and they won"t catch you .
Originally Posted by Ted G
It might go a little faster than 74
I thought you were gonna get in the 80-90 club and now your selling it . What are you switching to ?
OCCJoe is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 04:59 PM
  #35  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 15
From: Cedar Point NC
Default

Originally Posted by fantastixvoyage
Any comparison in x-dimensions? Bet the propshaft heights have varied a bunch depending on the expected application. Willing to be superbabi is set high and hence not much reaction to trim.
Coen found an X that worked well and stuck with it ! The lack of trim reaction is from lack of HP . 800 with that same trim would make dramatic changes in the attitude . I'm not knocking the HP in Ted's boat either because it looks like he's getting killer MPG and running in the 70's is still a lot of fun
OCCJoe is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 05:01 PM
  #36  
Ted G's Avatar
Charter Member
20 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,663
Likes: 2
From: Edgerock Baby!!
Default

Originally Posted by OCCJoe
LOL ! Busted a laugh on that one ..
Ted the race layup boats are heavier not lighter and one thing that has been proven is that all the Y2k run different
Originally Posted by OCCJoe
Ted just playing with you but a quote from May 2011..





I thought you were gonna get in the 80-90 club and now your selling it . What are you switching to ?
Pretty sure mine is race layup too, Gary pretty much bought everything in the catalog When I said light I mean low fuel and not much stuff, mine has stereo, porta pottie, cooler, etc, etc.

I did go faster than 74...just not much. I had/have access to LOTS more power if I wanted it, but then I would get into drive issues so I left well enough alone. And gas mileage is a good thing

If I sell it we are looking at an Intrepid Center Console, just like everyone else with performance boats right now
__________________
Chesapeake Bay Powerboat Association
www.cbpba.com
Ted G is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 05:10 PM
  #37  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 15
From: Cedar Point NC
Default

Originally Posted by Ted G
Pretty sure mine is race layup too, Gary pretty much bought everything in the catalog When I said light I mean low fuel and not much stuff, mine has stereo, porta pottie, cooler, etc, etc.

I did go faster than 74...just not much. I had/have access to LOTS more power if I wanted it, but then I would get into drive issues so I left well enough alone. And gas mileage is a good thing

If I sell it we are looking at an Intrepid Center Console, just like everyone else with performance boats right now
Have you tried dumping to porta-pottie ?????
OCCJoe is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 10:21 PM
  #38  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis Missouri
Default

Has anyone had problems with reversion with their y2k. The owner I bought my boat from had lots of trouble with this. Has had to have the motor redone a few times due to this. The boats sit low in the back and with the swim platform and side supports coming out to the platform it makes a perfect trap for water when stoping or reversing or just waves while idling. He had to have the exhaust modified with a 4in extension on top of the thunder exhaust manifolds to increase the angle of decent going out thru the transom. The motor is a big cubic in 565 with a pretty large cam witch doesn't help matters. I am wanting to put my CMI sport tube headers on but don't know if it would be a bad decision and possibly make the reversion situation worse.
Supreboat in is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 11:52 PM
  #39  
Ted G's Avatar
Charter Member
20 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,663
Likes: 2
From: Edgerock Baby!!
Default

Yes, ideally you should run dry exhaust with that engine and I added flappers on my exhaust pipes to help some. On one occasion it gulped water in reverse and almost died, a little throttle blip cleared it.
__________________
Chesapeake Bay Powerboat Association
www.cbpba.com
Ted G is offline  
Reply
Old 02-13-2013 | 06:27 AM
  #40  
Dave M's Avatar
Gold Member
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,664
Likes: 140
From: Hollywood, MD, USA
Default

I'm running rubber flappers on the outside too. I had internal flappers but they made an annoying rattling sound so I took them out. I'm always real careful coming off plane.

Oh, and my boat doesn't require a lot of trim either. About "3" on the indicator is my sweet spot. I have ITS though, not sure how that factors in.

Last edited by Dave M; 02-13-2013 at 06:33 AM.
Dave M is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.