Superbabi !! Heres your pics of your Y2K
07-17-2008 | 08:02 PM
#3841
Registered
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,152
Likes: 13
From: Toms River, NJ
07-17-2008 | 08:28 PM
#3842
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,509
Likes: 3
From: Emerald Isle, North Carolina
They are coming off the horizontal today.
I made a new rudder housing that accepts a "Bravo" style propeller.
This will give anywhere from 10-15 degrees more rake than I could get out of a Speedmaster propeller and we all know the cost obstacle when dealing with the speedmaster propellers.
The Maximus will fit also and this propeller has 30 degrees of rake.
This will allow a smaller boat that does not/can not handle a Cleaver propeller to run an Arneson without being burdened by a cleaver propeller.
The drive will have:
Less Stern Lift
Less Side Loading
Reduced Listing
Lower, FAR lower propeller cost and sourcing
Less "Man Handling" from the propeller
More Bow Lift
Less RPM to get on plane
Wider selection of propellers
Lighter propeller (if that matters)
Improved reversing, as the blade is not so blunt in the rear
Better tracking
More Propeller Rake. 25-30 degrees vs 15 for a Mercury Speedmaster.
For a small, or single engine application, this was an issue to some degree depending upon who's hull was being used. The propeller cost and selection was always an issue. Now with the high rake Maximus, the Bravo and others the advancement of technology has allowed us to take advantage of it.
I made a new rudder housing that accepts a "Bravo" style propeller.
This will give anywhere from 10-15 degrees more rake than I could get out of a Speedmaster propeller and we all know the cost obstacle when dealing with the speedmaster propellers.
The Maximus will fit also and this propeller has 30 degrees of rake.
This will allow a smaller boat that does not/can not handle a Cleaver propeller to run an Arneson without being burdened by a cleaver propeller.
The drive will have:
Less Stern Lift
Less Side Loading
Reduced Listing
Lower, FAR lower propeller cost and sourcing
Less "Man Handling" from the propeller
More Bow Lift
Less RPM to get on plane
Wider selection of propellers
Lighter propeller (if that matters)
Improved reversing, as the blade is not so blunt in the rear
Better tracking
More Propeller Rake. 25-30 degrees vs 15 for a Mercury Speedmaster.
For a small, or single engine application, this was an issue to some degree depending upon who's hull was being used. The propeller cost and selection was always an issue. Now with the high rake Maximus, the Bravo and others the advancement of technology has allowed us to take advantage of it.
It's looks like you may have a winner here. Can we get more specs. Plus a picture? Also, is it compatable the original Bravo cutout?
07-18-2008 | 03:08 AM
#3846
arneson-industries.com
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 7
From: California
It's based on my same "Bravo Conversion Kit" so the cutout is not an issue as my standoff box covers the Bravo cutout.
Yes it uses a transmission, BAM so there is no problems with a cone clutch. No weak links.
I'll have photos in a week or so when I get it on a boat.
Yes it uses a transmission, BAM so there is no problems with a cone clutch. No weak links.
I'll have photos in a week or so when I get it on a boat.
07-21-2008 | 10:08 PM
#3849
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,509
Likes: 3
From: Emerald Isle, North Carolina
If not............................. I should spend a few hours and draw something up on Autocad that bolts up to an existing Bravo, and patent it! Like an ITS with a dropdown in the rear to accomodate a dropdown box, around 6". Connecting to a surface drive! I'm a friggin genious!!! Why hasn't Arnesson thought of this? Just send me the royalties
I'll give you 3 weeks till I draw it up. Then it's all mine,and you'll have to buy it. Just kidding. Make it happen!!! It should have been made years ago! You guys would be beyound rich!!!
Rick
