Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Superboat
My next boat: Y2k! >

My next boat: Y2k!

Notices

My next boat: Y2k!

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-23-2005 | 02:50 PM
  #331  
FASTERDAMITT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 3
Default Re: My next boat: Y2k!

Oh cool, only 2 weeks before splashing!
FASTERDAMITT is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2005 | 07:49 PM
  #332  
FX10's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,509
Likes: 3
From: Emerald Isle, North Carolina
Default Re: My next boat: Y2k!

Tom,
Check this out. I was throwing this by JC about the 1:35 ratio XR drive. It has been beefed up at all the critical points. Appears to get around 400 more rpm to the prop.
I wonder if Zup or any of the other guys have tried one.
FX10 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2005 | 07:50 PM
  #333  
FX10's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,509
Likes: 3
From: Emerald Isle, North Carolina
Default Re: My next boat: Y2k!

oops, forgot the link. here it is.


http://www.go-fast.com/sterndrive_gear_ratios.htm
FX10 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2005 | 07:59 PM
  #334  
FASTERDAMITT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 3
Default Re: My next boat: Y2k!

I was running the 1.36 gears on my American Offshore until it blew(250hrs). I swithed to 1.50 and a bigger prop for less gear load like it says in the article. Yes, more speed with the 1.36 but a higher load on the drive gears. Should I go back to 1.36 gears? Let's research it. One good thing is the new XR is alot stronger than the one I had. Thanks FX!
FASTERDAMITT is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2005 | 08:12 PM
  #335  
FX10's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,509
Likes: 3
From: Emerald Isle, North Carolina
Default Re: My next boat: Y2k!

Tom,
From what I read, all those areas were addressed and beefed up to correct any problems. But you did answer my question. I did the calculations on Superbabi, using Kracks figures. Then changing the HP. Says Babi will do 88 with a stock bottom ( his is blueprinted.) But that is in the ballpark of what we were figuring anyway. Then I ran the program with a 1.35 and his speed went to 94. Personally, I think it's worth looking into. Check out the link on the NEW XR drive.

http://www.go-fast.com/mercruiser_bravo_sterndrives.htm


Rick
FX10 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2005 | 08:35 PM
  #336  
FASTERDAMITT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 3
Default Re: My next boat: Y2k!

FX, You are going to gain engine rpm on the other gears but that must be reduced by the different size prop. The only difference in reality is the lesser drag on a smaller pitch prop. The speed difference IMO will be minor. Do I make sense?
FASTERDAMITT is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2005 | 08:39 PM
  #337  
FASTERDAMITT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 3
Default Re: My next boat: Y2k!

Let me add to that. Changing ratio will eather speed up or slow down acceleration. You have a peak rpm limit and that's where you prop it at. If your top speed is 88 with 600hp then you will get there faster or slower depending on gear ratio and prop sellection, but not a big difference in top speed #'s.
FASTERDAMITT is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2005 | 09:00 PM
  #338  
FX10's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,509
Likes: 3
From: Emerald Isle, North Carolina
Default Re: My next boat: Y2k!

most likely loose it out of the hole, but gain on top end. Even changing the prop 2", it still comes out ahead.
FX10 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2005 | 09:29 PM
  #339  
FASTERDAMITT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 3
Default Re: My next boat: Y2k!

One advantage of a custom engine like the 572 or 600ci is it can make peak hp up to 7000rpm if it's not a heavy boat. Equates to faster acceleration and higher top speeds cause you will be able to run a smaller prop and turn it higher rpm.
FASTERDAMITT is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2005 | 12:45 PM
  #340  
Pat McPherson's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 3
From: Ivoryton, CT
Default Re: My next boat: Y2k!

From what I have read, the best/most efficient Bravo I prop pitch is 28-30".
I have also read that a 1.5 ratio drive is better for the transfer of torque. This makes the most sense as you would have a higher ratio. Remember torque is what really counts...
Last is that most say is that if your boat does not crack 100mph a 1.5 drive is better for over all performance...

The Zuperboat was originally rigged with a 1.36 drive as she ran near 100 with 750HP. Mike also ran with the 1.36 but said that the boat should have a 1.5 for better acceleration.

Gary's boat will likely perform better with a 1.5 ratio drive.
Tom's boat with 800HP will be more on the edge for the 1.36 ratio.

One other thing to consider guys: Professor Jcap and Fastedy are running a 1.5 drives...
They have done more testing than anyone...
__________________
Patrick
Pat McPherson is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.